2011
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31823834a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferon Gamma Release Assay Compared With the Tuberculin Skin Test for Latent Tuberculosis Detection in Pregnancy

Abstract: Objective To estimate agreement and correlation between the tuberculin skin test and an interferon gamma release assay for detecting latent tuberculosis (TB) infection in pregnant women. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of pregnant women initiating prenatal care at a university-affiliated public hospital between January 5, 2009 and March 15, 2010. Eligible women received a questionnaire about tuberculosis history and risk factors, as well as the tuberculin skin test and phlebotomy for the interfe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we show that a positive QGIT is associated with having contact with someone with pulmonary TB, similar to our prior observations among pregnant women uninfected with HIV in India and that of others (12,(22)(23)(24). Although other studies in pregnant women uninfected with HIV in the United States (22,25) did not show the same QGIT patients were substantially less likely to have been exposed to TB. Only 5-13% of women in these studies were IGRA 1 (vs. 10-23% TST 1 ) and the main discordance seen was IGRA 2 /TST 1 (7-16%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we show that a positive QGIT is associated with having contact with someone with pulmonary TB, similar to our prior observations among pregnant women uninfected with HIV in India and that of others (12,(22)(23)(24). Although other studies in pregnant women uninfected with HIV in the United States (22,25) did not show the same QGIT patients were substantially less likely to have been exposed to TB. Only 5-13% of women in these studies were IGRA 1 (vs. 10-23% TST 1 ) and the main discordance seen was IGRA 2 /TST 1 (7-16%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Only 5-13% of women in these studies were IGRA 1 (vs. 10-23% TST 1 ) and the main discordance seen was IGRA 2 /TST 1 (7-16%). Testing was also conducted earlier in pregnancy, when immune suppression is milder (25). A recent yet unpublished study of pregnant Kenyan women infected with HIV in their second/third trimester, by contrast, reported 25% QGIT 1 /TST 2 discordance (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies proved the value of IGRA in detecting LTBI in pregnant women, since the results of this test were not affected by BCG vaccination, thus avoiding the TST false positive result and the unnecessary, consequent INH prophylaxis [11],[21]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), such as QuantiFERON Gold Test In-Tube (QGIT; Cellestis) and T-SPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotech), measure IFN-γ released from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) exposed to TB-specific antigens. For detection of latent TB in pregnancy, IGRA showed good performance, while concordance and agreement were poor when comparing the tuberculin skin test (TST) and IGRA results [ 7 , 8 ]. To avoid false-positive interpretations, TST is discouraged and IGRA is recommended for TB screening and diagnosis in pregnant populations with high BCG vaccination coverage or uncertain vaccination status [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%