Intergroup Behavioral Strategies as Contextually Determined: Experimental Evidence from Israel

Abstract

Why are the negative effects of social diversity more pronounced in some places than in others? What are the mechanisms underlying the relationship between diversity and discriminatory behaviors, and why do they vary in prevalence and strength across locations? Experimental research has made advances in examining these questions by testing for differences in behavior when interacting with individuals from different groups. At the same time, research in American and comparative politics has demonstrated that attitudes toward other groups are a function of context. Uniting these two lines of research, we argue that discriminatory behaviors should be strongly conditioned by the ways in which groups are organized in space, allowing us to make predictions about the relationship between diversity, segregation, and intergroup behavior. We examine this claim in the context of intra-Jewish cleavage in Israel, using original data compiled through multisite lab-in-the-field experiments and survey responses collected across 20 locations. Ryan D. Enos (renos@gov.harvard.edu) is an associate professor of government at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. Noam Gidron (gidron @fas.harvard.edu) is a doctoral candidate in government at

Is There a Backlash Against Immigration From Richer Countries? International Hierarchy and the Limits of Group Threat

“…As Dancygier and Laitin () further contend, “explaining preferences for immigrant restrictions by pointing to survey responses about whether immigrants pose a threat…appears nearly tautological” (p. 46). These criticisms notwithstanding, however, there is still a substantial literature suggesting that—with regard to immigration—people's subjective perceptions of their group threat could be grounded in the contextually heterogeneous objective conditions of scarce resources and cultural distance (see Ceobanu & Escandell, ; Enos & Gidron, ; Hopkins, ).…”

Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot

“…It is well established that individuals display ingroup bias in attitudes, behaviors, and resource allocation, all else equal (Fiske 2000). This behavior, repeatedly observed in the laboratory, is often cited as one of the primary reasons for the well-established finding that diversity is negatively correlated with public goods provision cross-nationally (Alesina and Zhuravskaya 2008;Enos and Gidron 2016;Habyarimana et al 2009). Scholars have drawn direct connections between local ethnic diversity and the willingness of voters to allocate funds for public goods, including schools (Alesina, Baqir, and Easterly 1999;Rugh and Trounstine 2011).…”

The Power of Place? Testing the Geographic Determinants of African‐American and White Voter Turnout*

“…As the African‐American population of a county increases (and presumably African‐American political power) so does white mobilization. Subsequent research that has its intellectual roots in Key's threat hypothesis revolves around this assumption, with scholars finding evidence that out‐group population affects implicit and explicit racial attitudes, policy positions, and ultimately behavior (Enos and Gideon, ). The prediction here is that whites mobilize in response to African‐American political power within a county, which is a function of the African‐American population size.…”

“…There is a considerable amount of evidence that Allport was correct—increased interaction and familiarity between members of different groups can increase tolerance (Ellison and Powers, ; Pettigrew and Tropp, ) and has been found to reduce the level of support for nationalist or anti‐immigrant parties (Della Posta, ). The degree to which racial groups (in this case whites and African Americans) interact with one another has the potential to shape attitudes and behaviors (Enos and Gideon, ). We contend the potential for interracial contact is largely determined by local demographics—namely, the racial composition and level of segregation within the precinct.…”