2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9sm02513h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate wetting state at nano/microstructured surfaces

Abstract: A general partial wetting model to describe an intermediate wetting state is proposed in this study to explain the deviations between the experimental results and classical theoretical wetting models for hydrophobic surfaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect could be explained by the increasing level of porous silicon fractalization and the topography, which reduce the contact of the solid surface with the drop of the liquid [31] (Figure 3). Figure 4 illustrates the water contact angles (WCAs) on porous structures as a function of solid fraction (Φ), which was calculated by 1-Apore/A, where Apore is the summation of the pore area in a given area (A) [42]. It was measured several times in order to check the uniformities of the surface.…”
Section: Hydrophobic and Superhydrophobic States On Macropsimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This effect could be explained by the increasing level of porous silicon fractalization and the topography, which reduce the contact of the solid surface with the drop of the liquid [31] (Figure 3). Figure 4 illustrates the water contact angles (WCAs) on porous structures as a function of solid fraction (Φ), which was calculated by 1-Apore/A, where Apore is the summation of the pore area in a given area (A) [42]. It was measured several times in order to check the uniformities of the surface.…”
Section: Hydrophobic and Superhydrophobic States On Macropsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of flat silicon (Φ = 1), the CA was 69 • . Figure 4 illustrates the water contact angles (WCAs) on porous structures as a function of solid fraction (Φ), which was calculated by 1-Apore/A, where Apore is the summation of the pore area in a given area (A) [42]. It was measured several times in order to check the uniformities of the surface.…”
Section: Hydrophobic and Superhydrophobic States On Macropsimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RoA increased from an initial 15 • (19 • for dip-coated C) to ≥40 • , after 1000 h of UV or DH exposure, which was above the module tilt angle in many regions. The formation of blisters caused an increase in surface roughness and this effect shifted the coating wetting regime to the combined Cassie-Baxter/Wenzel intermediate state [22,23]. This caused the WCA to decrease only slowly and remain in the hydrophobic range, while the RoA rapidly deteriorated.…”
Section: Degradation Mode: Blister Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%