2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41537-021-00138-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent theta burst stimulation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia—A double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study

Abstract: Optimal noninvasive brain stimulation parameters for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia remain unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical and biological effects of intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS) in patients with treatment-resistant negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NCT00875498). In a randomized sham-controlled 2-arm study, 22 patients with schizophrenia and treatment-resistant negative symptoms received 20 sessions of either active (n = 12) or sham… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no acute effects of tDCS were observed immediately after the 5 days of stimulation, we observed a superiority of the active over the sham stimulation at the follow up regarding the number of remitters, one month after the simulation sessions. This is in line with other NIBS studies that have reported a delayed clinical effect of tDCS in patients with MDD [14], as well as of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left DLPFC, in both patients with MDD [15] and patients with negative schizophrenia [16], suggesting the delayed effect of NIBS-induced neural plasticity when applied over the DLPFC. The present results (see Figure 2) are also in line with current literature supporting a high inter-individual variability regarding the response to antidepressants treatment [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although no acute effects of tDCS were observed immediately after the 5 days of stimulation, we observed a superiority of the active over the sham stimulation at the follow up regarding the number of remitters, one month after the simulation sessions. This is in line with other NIBS studies that have reported a delayed clinical effect of tDCS in patients with MDD [14], as well as of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left DLPFC, in both patients with MDD [15] and patients with negative schizophrenia [16], suggesting the delayed effect of NIBS-induced neural plasticity when applied over the DLPFC. The present results (see Figure 2) are also in line with current literature supporting a high inter-individual variability regarding the response to antidepressants treatment [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effectiveness of iTBS has been confirmed in psychiatry and neurology ( 27 30 ). Meanwhile, iTBS has the advantages of short treatment time, high feasibility, and good economic benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Considerable effort has been made to reduce the financial and time burdens associated with noninvasive brain stimulation treatments, including the development of shorter protocols such as TBS protocols [18 ▪ ]. It was also proposed to provide a higher number of stimulation sessions per day, ranging from one per day in conventional use of HF-rTMS for depression to 2 per day with LF-rTMS or frontotemporal tDCS for hallucinations [37,38], and up to a higher number of sessions per day in the recent application of the so-called accelerated protocols [39].…”
Section: Toward Accelerated Protocols To Maximize Efficiency In Short...mentioning
confidence: 99%