Internal conversion in¹⁰⁰Tc

The reaction pp→pΛK + near threshold

“…(6) as g N ΛK = −(D + 3F )(M + M Λ )/(2 √ 3f π ) = −14.4, which is rather close to the empirical value g N ΛK = −13.2 of ref. [12]. For the second order chiral Lagrangian L (2) φB only the explicit chiral symmetry breaking terms (linear in the quark masses) are displayed in eq.…”

“…It is interesting to observe that the pointlike K + -exchange alone eqs. (12,15) gives K (K) = 0.41 fm 4 and if one omits the π 0 -exchange eqs. (11,14) one obtains from the remaining contributions K (V +K+η) = 0.43 fm 4 .…”

Transformation of nonbehavioral early intervention programs into behavioral programs: Principles and practice

“…None of the therapists used token economies, contingency contracting, self-regulatory training, or any other behavioral techniques. As described in detail in several excellent books (e.g., Martin & Pear, 1978;Sulzer-Azaroff & Mayer, 1977), these techniques generally require the establishment of specific operational goals (e.g., "to increase the amount of time Michael spends in class working at his desk"; "to decrease the frequency of Mary's fighting with other children") and the systematic application of self-administered or externally administered instructions, skills training, and reinforcement to achieve those goals gradually. Instead, therapists in this program stressed the importance of encouraging the open expression of feelings via the establishment of a warm, trusting relationship as the first and foremost goal for their work.…”

“…Similarly, several of these team leaders presented workshops on "new" techniques that had been used infrequently or not at all by many school teams. These workshops included presentations of specific cognitive-behavioral techniques that the workshop leaders had tried in their schools, such as contingency contracting, videotaped feedback in conjunction with contingency contracting, problem solving, use of explicit rule statements and prompts, and use of positive reinforcement and extinction procedures (see Martin & Pear, 1978;Sulzer-Azaroff & Mayer, 1977). Not only did the workshop presentation help to cement the loyalty of the workshop leaders to the procedures they used and advocated (see Bandura, 1977), but their successful case descriptions represented perhaps the most powerful method of interesting other staff members in the techniques utilized and hence in the model underlying them (Nisbett & Ross, 1980).…”

Excited states of100Tc from100Mo(p,nγ)100Tc reaction and the parabolic rule

“…Preliminary results for the l~176 levels have been obtained also by Martin and Wender [5] from the l~176 nT) l~176 reaction. On the isomeric states of l~176 Pinston et al [2], Bini et al [6], Bartsch et al [7], and Martin and Wender [8] have obtained data by means of pulsed beam techniques. 3.16%, 97Mo 0.80%, 96Mo 1.28%, 95Mo 1.11%, 94Mo 0.57 %, 92Mo 0.88 %.…”