2010
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Consensus Study of Antipsychotic Dosing

Abstract: In the absence of adequate prospective, randomized drug-drug comparisons, the present findings provide broad, international, expert consensus-based recommendations for most clinically employed antipsychotic drugs. They can support clinical practice, trial design, and interpretation of comparative antipsychotic trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
560
1
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,127 publications
(580 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
560
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Doses of antipsychotic drugs were calculated into chlorpromazine equivalents using Gardner’s consensus article from 2010 40. For those drugs for which the article does not provide an algorithm, the World Health Organization’s defined daily doses were used 41.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doses of antipsychotic drugs were calculated into chlorpromazine equivalents using Gardner’s consensus article from 2010 40. For those drugs for which the article does not provide an algorithm, the World Health Organization’s defined daily doses were used 41.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individualized plans of antipsychotic medication for patients were determined by psychiatrists who were blind to the group allocation. Doses of antipsychotics (amisulpride, aripiprazole, chlorpromazine, clozapine; olanzpine, paliperidone, perphenazine, risperidone, quetiapine, sulpiride, and ziprasidone) were converted to chlorpromazine equivalents [33]. Mood stabilizers, benzodiazepines and anticholinergic medications were permitted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A posteriori, taking into account that in the present study drugs were given i.v., the range of doses selected compares favourably, on a milligramme per kilogramme basis, with Fig. 1 Schematic localization of microdialysis probe dialysing portion within the PFCX, the NAc shell (sh) and core (co) according to Paxinos and Watson (1998) individual doses of intramuscular and oral APs utilized in the clinic (Gardner et al 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%