International student mobility: A systematic review and research agenda

Over the years, consumers have been questioning the intentions and actions of firms, resulting in a cynical attitude and behaviour. Due to the severity of the outcomes that cynical consumers may display, reputed journals and prolific researchers have addressed the core issue in their own unique ways. However, no single study offers a uniform, comprehensive, and contemporary review of consumer cynicism literature. Thus, we use an interdisciplinary approach to study the literature spanning 47 years (1976–2022) on cynicism in consumer research, psychology, and organizational domains through a hybrid review involving bibliometric and systematic literature reviews. Following the SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol, this review shows the most cited and co‐cited articles, researchers, and keywords in cynicism research. We infer that the consumer cynicism construct draws heavily from the organizational behaviour area, possessing the potential to be correlated with, and extended to interdisciplinary research. Also, we offer an all‐inclusive model of the predictors and predictands of consumer cynicism based on the ADO‐TCM framework. We close this study with its academic contributions, practical implications, and future research directions using the ADO‐TCM framework.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consumer cynicism: Interdisciplinary hybrid review and research agenda

Indibara

Halder

Varshney

2023

“…We relied on the approach adopted by Goyal and Kumar (2021) to filter the articles and create a sub-data set to conduct a manageable and quality-enabled content analysis. For this We adopted this approach to endow our review with seminal insights and recent advancements in the domain (Hao et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2023).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, keeping these glaring gaps in the purview, we follow state‐of‐the‐art hybrid systematic review articles (Behl et al, 2022; Goyal & Kumar, 2021; Jebarajakirthy et al, 2021; Loureiro et al, 2021; Luo et al, 2023; Mariani et al, 2023; Sharma et al, 2020; Sureka et al, 2022; Tsiotsou & Boukis, 2022) for mapping performance trends, examining the intellectual structure and evaluating the extant research (as per TCCM framework) of anthropomorphism and consumer behaviour research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, urgent scholarly attention is required to address a gap, as there is a lack of a framework-based review of the domain that could provide insights particular to theory, context, characteristics, and methodology (TCCM). Therefore, keeping these glaring gaps in the purview, we follow state-of-the-art hybrid systematic review articles (Behl et al, 2022;Goyal & Kumar, 2021;Jebarajakirthy et al, 2021;Loureiro et al, 2021;Luo et al, 2023;Mariani et al, 2023;Sharma et al, 2020;Sureka et al, 2022;Tsiotsou & Boukis, 2022) for mapping performance trends, examining the intellectual structure and evaluating the extant research (as per TCCM framework) of anthropomorphism and consumer behaviour research.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Anthropomorphism and consumer behaviour: ASPAR‐4‐SLRprotocol compliant hybrid review

Khan,

Anas,

Uddin

2023

The notion of ‘anthropomorphism’ has been a subject of intrigue for transdisciplinary academics and scholars for the longest time, as the origin of this concept dates back to the BCE (Before Common Era). Over the past few decades, anthropomorphism literature has been burgeoning in the marketing discipline and its subfields (branding, advertising, consumer behaviour, etc.). This relatively novel stream adopts anthropomorphism as a concept and offers fascinating insights into consumers and their choices, behaviour, and intentions. Although there have been several qualitative review‐based assessments of anthropomorphism within the marketing field, none have been informed by quantitative tools or through a framework‐based approach. Our hybrid variant of systematic review fills this gap by using bibliometric techniques (performance analysis, co‐authorship analysis of countries and authors, and co‐word analysis of keywords) and Theories‐Context‐Characteristics‐Methods (TCCM) framework to show the evolution, trends, and intellectual structure of anthropomorphism in consumer behaviour research. We depict the evolving trajectory and trends over time using a sample of 432 peer‐reviewed journal articles and 27,671 secondary references (between 2005 and 2023) on anthropomorphism in consumer behaviour. Significant results include identifying and describing the most influential authors, articles, journals and countries, different research streams, their development, and future research directions. We also present six knowledge clusters delineating the intellectual knowledge structure of the field. An additional section depicting theories employed, characteristics explored, contexts examined, and methods utilized in the domain have also been presented. Furthermore, we used the TCCM framework to orchestrate possible trajectories for future research. By doing this, we offer academics and practitioners a systematic comprehension of the advancements in the domain and a comprehensive road map for future research.

“…However, it alone does not explain the TCM that could guide future research. Similarly, the TCM framework is useful for replicating or making discoveries in any research domain (Luo et al, 2023;Mishra et al, 2021;Narayanan & Singh, 2023); it provides limited insights into any phenomenon as compared to the ADO framework (Lim et al, 2021); ergo, the integration of the two frameworks is logical.…”

Section: Ado-tcm Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamics of value co‐creation behavior: A systematic review and future research agenda

Jain,

Sharma,

Devi

2023

Value co‐creation (VCC) continues to gain traction as a marketing concept in several service contexts. Given the limited understanding of how the VCC process translates into customers' actual behavior, VCC behavior (VCCB) describes the involvement of customers in the VCC process and includes active behavior during physical, virtual, and mental processes. Extant research on co‐creation unveils the antecedents and consequences of VCCB; however, no single study has assimilated the various factors that interplay in the actual co‐creation process. This systematic literature review of 136 research papers published from 2004 to June 2023, obtained from the Web of Science database, provides an overview of the existing empirical studies on VCCB. We used the established integrated theories, contexts, and methods‐antecedents, decisions, and outcomes (TCM‐ADO) framework and identified the important TCM used in the VCCB research. This review further identified 88 distinct antecedents classified into seven broad categories, decisions, and outcomes of VCCB. Additionally, we synthesized the mediators, moderators, and control variables used in extant studies. The review‐based research findings demonstrate future research directions for each dimension of the TCM‐ADO framework. The research questions presented in this study are set as a future research agenda to further comprehend the nuances of the VCCB that will help service firms implement the VCC process to its full potential.