Internet Filter Intention Measure

Tsai, Tsung-Yen; Wei, Chun-Shu; Tsai, Chung-Yu

doi:10.1037/t31828-000

Cited by 3 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, case managers showed a preference for ACT as they were able to provide follow-up support to clients for an extended period of time (Clark, 2016). reported in fifteen studies (Choy- Brown, 2021;Clifasefi, 2016;Cole, 2017;Collins, 2019;García, 2020;Miller, 2001;Montgomery, 2017;Montgomery, 2019;Newman, 2017;Richardson, 1996;Roberts, 2012;Tsai, 2014;Vitopoulos, 2018). The types of nonhousing support that clients received related to education, employment, finance, parenting, independent living skills, and substance abuse (Choy- Brown, 2021;Clifasefi, 2016;Cole, 2017;Collins, 2019;García, 2020;Miller, 2001;Montgomery, 2017;Montgomery, 2019;Richardson, 1996;Roberts, 2012;Tsai, 2014;Vitopoulos, 2018).…”

Section: Time Limit (Two Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta‐analysis and thematic synthesis

Weightman

Kelson

Thomas

et al. 2023

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Adequate housing is a basic human right. The many millions of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a lower life expectancy and more physical and mental health problems. Practical and effective interventions to provide appropriate housing are a public health priority. Objectives To summarise the best available evidence relating to the components of case‐management interventions for PEH via a mixed methods review that explored both the effectiveness of interventions and factors that may influence its impact. Search Methods We searched 10 bibliographic databases from 1990 to March 2021. We also included studies from Campbell Collaboration Evidence and Gap Maps and searched 28 web sites. Reference lists of included papers and systematic reviews were examined and experts contacted for additional studies. Selection Criteria We included all randomised and non‐randomised study designs exploring case management interventions where a comparison group was used. The primary outcome of interest was homelessness. Secondary outcomes included health, wellbeing, employment and costs. We also included all studies where data were collected on views and experiences that may impact on implementation. Data Collection and Analysis We assessed risk of bias using tools developed by the Campbell Collaboration. We conducted meta‐analyses of the intervention studies where possible and carried out a framework synthesis of a set of implementation studies identified by purposive sampling to represent the most ‘rich’ and ‘thick’ data. Main Results We included 64 intervention studies and 41 implementation studies. The evidence base was dominated by studies from the USA and Canada. Participants were largely (though not exclusively) people who were literally homeless, that is, living on the streets or in shelters, and who had additional support needs. Many studies were assessed as having a medium or high risk of bias. However, there was some consistency in outcomes across studies that improved confidence in the main findings. Case Management and Housing Outcomes Case management of any description was superior to usual care for homelessness outcomes (standardised mean difference [SMD] = −0.51 [95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.71, −0.30]; p < 0.01). For studies included in the meta‐analyses, Housing First had the largest observed impact, followed by Assertive Community Treatment, Critical Time Intervention and Intensive Case Management. The only statistically significant difference was between Housing First and Intensive Case Management (SMD = −0.6 [–1.1, −0.1]; p = 0.03) at ≥12 months. There was not enough evidence to compare the above approaches with standard case management within the meta‐analyses. A narrative comparison across all studies was inconclusive, though suggestive of a trend in favour of more intensive approaches. Case Management and Mental Health Outcomes The overall evidence suggested that case management of any description was not more or less effective compared to usual care for an individual's mental he...

show abstract

Section: Time Limit (Two Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta‐analysis and thematic synthesis

Weightman

Kelson

Thomas

et al. 2023

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Late-onset sepsis frequently presents with clinical deterioration including apnoea, tachypnoea, increased ventilatory requirement, hypotension, abnormal heart rate, hyperglycaemia, abnormal temperature (hypo-or hyperthermia), cyanosis, acidosis, feeding intolerance, abdominal distension, lethargy, and skin mottling (Cra 2000;Tsai 2014). As some of these clinical manifestations can be non-specific, it can be di icult to clinically distinguish between sepsis and deep-seated infections, such as meningitis, osteomyelitis, and necrotising enterocolitis (Camacho-Gonzalez 2013;Zea-Vera 2015).…”

Section: B a C K G R O U N D Description Of The Condition Definitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Late-onset sepsis is most common in premature (< 37 weeks) and low birthweight (< 2500 g) neonates (Stoll 2011;Tsai 2014).…”

Section: Epidemiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most frequent gram-negative pathogens are Klebsiella spp., E. coli, Pseudomonas, and Salmonella spp (Breurec 2016;Hammoud 2012;Vergnano 2005;WHO 1999;Zaidi 2005). The pathogen with the highest case fatality ratio is considered to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Hammoud 2012;Tsai 2014).…”

Section: Etiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Late-onset sepsis has several risk factors. Major risk factors are immaturity, mechanical ventilation, intravascular catheterisation, the failure of early enteral feeding with breast milk, a prolonged duration of parenteral nutrition, surgery, underlying respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and hospitalisation (Boghossian 2013;Leal 2012;Stoll 2002;Tröger 2014;Tsai 2014). Furthermore, neonates are theoretically immunocompromised as several components of the immune system are not fully developed at birth (Camacho-Gonzalez 2013;Kumar 2016).…”

Section: Etiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis

Korang

Safi

Gupta

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Use of Industrial Filters by Health Care Workers During Shortages of N95 Respirators in Pandemic Times

Lin

Munter

Pascavis

et al. 2021

Infect Dis Clin Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant shortage of personal protective equipment in multiple health care facilities around the world, with the highest impact on N95 respirator masks. The N95 respirator is a mask that blocks at least 95% of very small (0.3 μm) particles and is considered a standard for enhanced respiratory precautions. The N95 mask shortage has created a need for other options for nasal and oral respiratory protection with similar filtration efficiency and “medical-grade” clearance, which can be used in health care settings. However, the literature around various filter types, their filtration capabilities, and the organizations certifying their use is dense, confusing, and not easily accessible to the public. Here, we synthesize relevant literature to analyze and disseminate information on (1) alternative viable filter options to N95s, (2) the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health certification process, (3) the relationship of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health certification to Food and Drug Administration certification of filtration devices and surgical masks, and (4) how this relationship may affect future filtration usage in the medical community during a pandemic. Analysis of these standards is meant to inform regarding evidence of respirator efficacy but does not imply any official endorsement of these alternatives. With this article, we illuminate viable alternative respirator options during the COVID-19 pandemic to help alleviate the dependency on N95 face masks.

show abstract

Internet Filter Intention Measure

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta‐analysis and thematic synthesis

Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta‐analysis and thematic synthesis

Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis

Use of Industrial Filters by Health Care Workers During Shortages of N95 Respirators in Pandemic Times

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About