2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01880-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver and intra-observer consistency in the endoscopic assessment of colonic pit patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…38,39 We have documented all resected lesions, with pit-pattern findings, diameter, and final pathological findings. 40,41 The pit patterns (Fig. 2) were classified as I, II, IIIs (small), IIIl (large), IV, Vi (irregular), and Vn (nonstructural).…”
Section: Endoscopic Prediction Of Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 We have documented all resected lesions, with pit-pattern findings, diameter, and final pathological findings. 40,41 The pit patterns (Fig. 2) were classified as I, II, IIIs (small), IIIl (large), IV, Vi (irregular), and Vn (nonstructural).…”
Section: Endoscopic Prediction Of Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight years have past and recently reproducibility was demonstrated [16] , in an altered simplified three patterns classification with management consequences or prognosis implications: I and Ⅱ as non-neoplastic; ⅢL and IV as neoplastic; and Ⅲs and V as neoplastic possibly invasive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in proposing a guide of practice for the management of patients with atrophic chronic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia may be related to the fact that conventional endoscopy used in most studies shows a low reproducibility and poor relation with histology at diagnosing these diffuse mucosal changes and minute lesions of cancer [7,8] . For the last ten years, several studies considered magnification and high-resolution endoscopy in conjunction with chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of precancerous [9][10][11][12][13][14] and neoplastic lesions [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] , in the gastrointestinal tract. However, mostly authors focused on the validity assessment and rarely were reliability or the learning of each group description defined [16,17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na análise isolada para cada padrão de criptas, a concordância entre os três observadores foi também bastante aproximada, exceto quanto ao tipo V (0,330). Em estudo semelhante, Huang et al (30) obtiveram um índice estimado de Kappa de 0,716, mostrando excelente concordância entre os seis observadores selecionados. É possível que esse resultado tão expressivo tenha sido favorecido pela utilização de alta magnificação, que teoricamente pode aguçar a capacidade de interprretação para alguns padrões de criptas, principalmente os pequenos (IIIS e V).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified