2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of gas transient pulse tests on low-porosity rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum pressure at the wellhead will increase to over 22 MPa for a short well screen (Case 1), during which any possible hazards caused by pressure build-up should be considered [28]. Also the high pressure during initial gas bubble injection process can change the permeability and porosity of aquifer near the wellbore [29], which may cause the subsequent injection pressure variance. In the practice engineering, the high build-up pressure in the initial gas bubble injection process can be avoided by possible injection method or process (e.g., constant pressure injection or the intermittent injection).…”
Section: Initial Gas Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum pressure at the wellhead will increase to over 22 MPa for a short well screen (Case 1), during which any possible hazards caused by pressure build-up should be considered [28]. Also the high pressure during initial gas bubble injection process can change the permeability and porosity of aquifer near the wellbore [29], which may cause the subsequent injection pressure variance. In the practice engineering, the high build-up pressure in the initial gas bubble injection process can be avoided by possible injection method or process (e.g., constant pressure injection or the intermittent injection).…”
Section: Initial Gas Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%