2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interprofessional collaboration to promote transportation equity for environmental justice populations: A mixed methods study of civil engineers, transportation planners, and social workers' perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Fields et al (2020) found that while interactions between social workers and transportation experts (i.e., engineers and planners) are limited, there is a willingness and potential for greater interprofessional collaboration between the two fields. A primary advantage of this interprofessional collaboration is that social workers possess an in-depth understanding of the barriers their patients face in accessing health care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Fields et al (2020) found that while interactions between social workers and transportation experts (i.e., engineers and planners) are limited, there is a willingness and potential for greater interprofessional collaboration between the two fields. A primary advantage of this interprofessional collaboration is that social workers possess an in-depth understanding of the barriers their patients face in accessing health care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary advantage of this interprofessional collaboration is that social workers possess an in-depth understanding of the barriers their patients face in accessing health care. Specifically, “this collaboration provides an opportunity to adequately serve [vulnerable] populations by re-evaluating long-held practices related to data collection and data analysis within the transportation decision-making process, particularly with regard to the understanding of transportation gaps and needs of vulnerable populations,” ( Fields et al 2020 pg. 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition of social differences can facilitate the inclusion of certain people in decision-making. Redistributive action can empower previously marginalized people to actively participate in public decision-making (Fields et al, 2020). The adoption system that is carried out for the…”
Section: Figure 1 Al Fajar Islamic Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal or regulatory catalysts for EJ and broad public participation in the project delivery process are shown to be important factors in uencing the integration of EJ within an implementing agency's assessment and governance strategy (Sen, 2008;Strelau & Köckler, 2016). Additionally, studies suggest interdisciplinary collaborative approaches have bene ts for transportation practitioners (Fields et al, 2020) and students (Miller et al, 2019), raising the importance of interprofessional governance approaches as a possibility of effectively meeting the needs of EJ communities in transportation project delivery.…”
Section: Existing Practitioner Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%