2005
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InterProScan: protein domains identifier

Abstract: InterProScan [E. M. Zdobnov and R. Apweiler (2001) Bioinformatics, 17, 847–848] is a tool that combines different protein signature recognition methods from the InterPro [N. J. Mulder, R. Apweiler, T. K. Attwood, A. Bairoch, A. Bateman, D. Binns, P. Bradley, P. Bork, P. Bucher, L. Cerutti et al. (2005) Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D201–D205] consortium member databases into one resource. At the time of writing there are 10 distinct publicly available databases in the application. Protein as well as DNA sequences ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
2,083
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,602 publications
(2,101 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
2,083
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…tRNAs were predicted using tRNAscan-SE 40 . All predicted proteins were functionally annotated using SignalP 41 for signal sequences, TMHMM 42 for transmembrane domains, interProScan 43 59 and a Yule tree prior 60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tRNAs were predicted using tRNAscan-SE 40 . All predicted proteins were functionally annotated using SignalP 41 for signal sequences, TMHMM 42 for transmembrane domains, interProScan 43 59 and a Yule tree prior 60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein sequences from genes predicted by Maker were functionally annotated using NCBI blastp v.2.2.30+ versus the NCBI non-redundant refseq protein database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/), versus the UniProt database 48 , and using InterProScan (v. 5.6-48.0) 49 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26) on Refseq protein, Swissprot, and Ensembl protein reference files from Crassostrea gigas, Lottia gigantea, and Lingula anatina to retrieve the corresponding annotations. The contigs were also processed with rnammer (Lagesen et al 2007) (standard parameters, version 1.2) to find ribosomal genes, with repeatmasker (Smith et al n.d.) (-engine crossmatch -gccalc -species Danio rerio parameters, version open-4-0-3) to list the contained repeats and with interproscan (Quevillon et al 2005) (-goterms -pathways parameters, version 4.8) for gene ontology and structural annotation. Reads have been realigned back to contigs with bwa (Li and Durbin 2009) (standard parameters, mem algorithm, version 0.7.12).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%