1969
DOI: 10.1016/0040-9383(69)90026-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersections and embeddings of polyhedra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, mixed-valence compounds tend to undergo charge-order transitions at low temperatures. In lacunar spinels it is believed that the metal ions within the cubane M4X4 clusters form M4 units with a unique molecular electron density [19]. It seems interesting to check if these electronic molecular structures are stable up to elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, mixed-valence compounds tend to undergo charge-order transitions at low temperatures. In lacunar spinels it is believed that the metal ions within the cubane M4X4 clusters form M4 units with a unique molecular electron density [19]. It seems interesting to check if these electronic molecular structures are stable up to elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These all are controlled versions of Harris' criteria [Harr], however we use some ideas, additional (proof of 7.2) and alternative (proof of 7.4) to that of [Harr]. In fact, our proof of 7.4 is a new geometric proof of [Harr,Th. 2] (roughly a half of 1.7a-) and a good candidate for generalization for k-tuples of points.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivariant homotopy H p,q+1 is defined analogously to as F ′ in [Harr,proof of Proposition 9], and it follows from the construction of F ′ in [Harr]…”
Section: Proof Of Criterion 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of [Web67,Har69] was actually designed for the proof of Theorem 1.1α and thus is not optimal: the result of [Web67,Har69] concerning the existence of an immersion has the dimension restriction 2m ≥ 3n + 3 instead of 2m ≥ 3n + 2 as in Theorem 1.3β. The proofs [Web67,Har69] can be perhaps modified to work for 2m ≥ 3n + 2 (at least to obtain some immersion h, i.e. without the property h eq Φ on SN ).…”
Section: Construction Of An Immersionmentioning
confidence: 99%