Interventions to Increase Recommendation and Delivery of Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers by Healthcare Providers

Sabatino, Susan A.; Habarta, Nancy; Baron, Roy C.; Coates, Ralph J.; Rimer, Barbara K.; Kerner, Jon; Coughlin, Steven S.; Kalra, Geetika P.; Chattopadhyay, Sajal K.

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.008

Cited by 123 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…718 Audit and feedback of provider performance improves some cancer screening rates, but more diverse studies of other disease states need to be evaluated before the results can be generalized to all prevention of all diseases. 719 The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke program has shown that in the inpatient setting, audit and feedback of performance on secondary stroke preventive measures is associated with improved adherence. 720 Just as the use of standing stroke order sets improves adherence for in-hospital care of stroke patients, 721,722 the use of standardized tools in outpatient clinics increases the proportion of patients receiving appropriate screening and preventive care.…”

Section: Preventive Health Services/strategies To Improve Adherencementioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke

Goldstein¹,

Bushnell²,

Adams³

et al. 2011

Stroke

1,298

577

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Purpose-This guideline provides an overview of the evidence on established and emerging risk factors for stroke to provide evidence-based recommendations for the reduction of risk of a first stroke. Methods-Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA Manuscript Oversight Committee. The writing group used systematic literature reviews (covering the time since the last review was published in 2006 up to April 2009), reference to previously published guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate recommendations using standard AHA criteria (Tables 1 and 2). All members of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on the recommendations and approved the final version of this document. The guideline underwent extensive peer review by the Stroke Council leadership and the AHA scientific statements oversight committees before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Results-Schemes for assessing a person's risk of a first stroke were evaluated. Risk factors or risk markers for a first stroke were classified according to potential for modification (nonmodifiable, modifiable, or potentially modifiable) and strength of evidence (well documented or less well documented). Nonmodifiable risk factors include age, sex, low birth weight, race/ethnicity, and genetic predisposition. Well-documented and modifiable risk factors include hypertension, exposure to cigarette smoke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and certain other cardiac conditions, dyslipidemia, carotid artery stenosis, sickle cell disease, postmenopausal hormone therapy, poor diet, physical inactivity, and obesity and body fat

show abstract

Section: Preventive Health Services/strategies To Improve Adherencementioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke

Goldstein¹,

Bushnell²,

Adams³

et al. 2011

Stroke

1,298

577

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, just sending personal invitation letters and increasing the availability of screening in the clinical settings does not appear to greatly improve the cancer screening rates. The CDC recommends provider-oriented interventions, which evaluate the providers' performance and present the providers with the results, to increase cancer screening (Sabatino et al, 2008). The MHLW reported that implementing cancer screening and specific health checkups simultaneously improved cancer screening rates in some municipalities (MHLW, 2012b).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is the Most Effective Strategy for Improving the Cancer Screening Rate in Japan?

Sano¹,

Goto²,

Hamashima³

2014

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cancer screening rates in Japan are much lower than those in Western countries. This study evaluated the relationship between cancer screening rates and strategies used to improve screening rates, and determined which strategy is the most effective. Materials and Methods: All municipalities are responsible for conducting gastric, lung, colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screenings in Japan. Of the 1,746 municipalities in total, 92-99% were included in the analyses for each cancer screening. Using national data in 2009, the correlations between cancer screening rates and strategies for improving screening rates of all municipalities, both large (populations of over 30,000) and small (populations of under 30,000), were determined. The strategies used were as follows: sending personal invitation letters, personal visits by community health workers, use of a clinical setting for screening, and free screening. Results: Of all four strategies used to improve cancer screening rates, sending personal invitation letters had the highest correlations with all screening rates, with the exception of breast cancer screening. The partial correlation coefficients linking this strategy with the screening rates in all municipalities were 0.28, 0.32, 0.30, and 0.26 for gastric, lung, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening, respectively. In large municipalities, the correlations between the number of examinees in a clinical setting and the screening rates were also relatively high, particularly for cervical cancer screening (r=0.41). Conclusions: Sending personal invitation letters appears to be particularly effective in improving cancer screening rates in all municipalities. All municipalities should implement a system that sends personal invitation letters for cancer screening. In large municipalities, increasing the availability of screening in a clinical setting is also effective in improving cancer screening rates.

show abstract

“…; short-term with hr-HPV detection test is inexpensive, and Provide Greater security than conventional cytology; these benefi ts, public health programs have logistical problems for screening including what kind of hr-HPV test is used to determine Appropriate for ages and screening intervals, management of HPV-positive women hr, ensure quality, addiction and test application programs for the prevention of cervical cancer. The hr-HPV testing is more Effective in detecting HSIL and cervical cancer prevention than cytology in women older than 35 years have proven to be more Also Effective than cytology or VIA and reduced the incidence and mortality from cervical cancer in advanced stages in developing countries [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”

Section: Primary Cervical Cancer Screeningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening and Prevention of Cervical Cancer in the World

Manuel¹

2017

J Gynecol Res Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cervical cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among gynecological cancers worldwide. Cervical cancer is the main cancer found in developing countries. There are risk factors for cervical cancer worldwide, mainly persistent infection of high risk HPV, especially genotypes 16 and 18 viruses. Cervical cancer prevented when precursor lesions detected and treated before they develop cancer. Cervical cancer is preventable, and effective screening programs reduce morbidity and mortality associated with this type of cancer; however, the programs vary according to socio-economic conditions of each country, which refl ected in the increased incidence, morbidity, mortality from cervical cancer in developing countries.

show abstract

Interventions to Increase Recommendation and Delivery of Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers by Healthcare Providers

Cited by 123 publications

References 32 publications

Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke

Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke

What is the Most Effective Strategy for Improving the Cancer Screening Rate in Japan?

Screening and Prevention of Cervical Cancer in the World

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About