2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions to mitigate moral distress: A systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A descriptive, correlational study found job satisfaction, practice environment, and age as predictors of moral distress among a sample of US critical care nurses ( Hiler et al., 2018 ). The evidence is weak on interventions that reduce moral distress as a result of the different causes and effects of moral distress ( Imbulana et al, 2021 ; Morley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A descriptive, correlational study found job satisfaction, practice environment, and age as predictors of moral distress among a sample of US critical care nurses ( Hiler et al., 2018 ). The evidence is weak on interventions that reduce moral distress as a result of the different causes and effects of moral distress ( Imbulana et al, 2021 ; Morley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the MMD-HP is the most recent and comprehensive scale [ 25 ], we used Lamiani’s 14-item Italian MDS-R as the main reference [ 11 ]. The reasons for this decision are that it was already validated for Italian adult intensive care settings and because it derived directly from the MDS-R, which is, currently, the most used instrument in MD research worldwide [ 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is broad agreement that MD has a detrimental effect on both a personal and professional level [ 5 , 6 ], and many studies have focused on it, ranging from descriptive correlational to experimental research. However, most of these articles lack scientific rigor and present significant threats to internal and external validity; thus, measurable and methodologically rigorous studies are currently requested to build evidence-based literature in this field [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 They also referred to the scientific challenge of evaluating the impact of its various interventions aimed at mitigating it. 15 Recent calls to abandon the concept of moral distress 16 or to revise it conceptually 17 represent some attempts to manage this conceptual gap. After all, it is the natural course of scientific development that models and theories are proposed, tested, and re-planned to better fit those elements they are missing and to adequately respond to their critique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 They also referred to the scientific challenge of evaluating the impact of its various interventions aimed at mitigating it. 15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%