The Research Interview 2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137353368_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interviews as Reflective Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While now living and working in Australia, SK was born in a rural district in Afghanistan, an LMIC with poor maternal and child health outcomes and limited access to healthcare. Reflexively in the research process was operationalised via observation, reflection and through discussions with the other co-authors and colleagues [ 16 ]. MC’s medical background and clinical experience and discussion between MC and SK immediately after each interview enhanced data integrity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While now living and working in Australia, SK was born in a rural district in Afghanistan, an LMIC with poor maternal and child health outcomes and limited access to healthcare. Reflexively in the research process was operationalised via observation, reflection and through discussions with the other co-authors and colleagues [ 16 ]. MC’s medical background and clinical experience and discussion between MC and SK immediately after each interview enhanced data integrity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MC’s medical background and clinical experience and discussion between MC and SK immediately after each interview enhanced data integrity. SK also maintained a journal throughout, allowing her to examine her own learnings, values and feelings and facilitate a deeper engagement with participants’ experiences [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I selected semi-structured interviews as they provide the ability to focus on a specific area of interest (participation in a learning community) while allowing me to dialogically explore unexpected points of interest and delve deeper into key issues via probing questions (Brinkmann, 2018). In addition, in this study I recognize the claim made by numerous researchers (Kvale & Brinkmann, 2009;Mann, 2016) that an interview is a co-construction of knowledge in which the interviewer is "a knowledge-producing participant in the process" (Brinkmann, 2018(Brinkmann, , p. 1002. This naturally means that claims to generalizable 'truths' are problematic.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Researcher reflexivity has increasingly been discussed in applied linguistic Pérez-Milans (e.g., Starfield, 2013; Copland & Creese, 2016; Kirkham & Mackey, 2016; Mann, 2016; Pérez-Milans, 2017). Most of the discussions on reflexivity have focused on Pérez-Milans enactment of reflexivity in the research process (Sarangi & Candlin, 2003; Starfield, 2013; Pérez-Milans, 2017), that is, understanding reflexivity as the process in which researchers critically reflect on (1) their biases, theoretical predisposition, assumptions, and power relations vis-à-vis the researched, and (2) on how these aspects affect every stage of the research, from the disciplinary framing of the research questions, the choice of the research methodology, to how they present their findings (Schwandt, 2001; Guillemin & Gillam, 2004; Berger, 2015; Whitaker & Atkinson, 2019).…”
Section: Research Agendas and Research Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%