2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00466-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and differences of kyphotic angle measurements on ultrasound images versus radiographs for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al 3 proposed the COL method for assessing the coronal curvature of children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); the reliability and validity of using this COL method have been statistically evaluated and well-verified over the years for both scoliosis deformity assessment and vertebral rotation measurements. [14][15][16][17] Sayed et al 18 also proved the reliability of measuring kyphotic angles on ultrasound images using the COL method for identifying the spinous process landmarks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chen et al 3 proposed the COL method for assessing the coronal curvature of children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); the reliability and validity of using this COL method have been statistically evaluated and well-verified over the years for both scoliosis deformity assessment and vertebral rotation measurements. [14][15][16][17] Sayed et al 18 also proved the reliability of measuring kyphotic angles on ultrasound images using the COL method for identifying the spinous process landmarks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 The advantages of 3D ultrasonography imaging are its nonionizing, readily accessible, and low‐cost nature. During the past decade, a 3D ultrasonography system has been developed and demonstrated to provide valid and reliable measurements to access coronal 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 and sagittal 23 , 24 , 25 curvatures using various landmarks of the posterior spinal elements such as spinous and transverse processes and laminae. Evaluation of AVR could also be assessed using these landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%