2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-skeletal variability in trace elemental content of Precolumbian Chupicuaro human bones: the record of post-mortem alteration and a tool for palaeodietary reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhumations sampled were adult individuals (4 females and 1 male), while the 20 ossuary burials included 5 children (b 5 years old) and 15 adults (1 female, 5 males, 2 probable males and 7 undetermined individuals). For the skeletons found in articulation more than one anatomical element was analysed for examining potential intra-skeletal geochemical differences (Maurer et al, 2011(Maurer et al, , 2014. In total 40 human samples were submitted for analysis and are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Human Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inhumations sampled were adult individuals (4 females and 1 male), while the 20 ossuary burials included 5 children (b 5 years old) and 15 adults (1 female, 5 males, 2 probable males and 7 undetermined individuals). For the skeletons found in articulation more than one anatomical element was analysed for examining potential intra-skeletal geochemical differences (Maurer et al, 2011(Maurer et al, , 2014. In total 40 human samples were submitted for analysis and are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Human Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results show that there are differences in crystallinity at the intra-skeletal scale, as well as at the grave level, between primary inhumations and ossuaries buried in the same grave (Table 5). These intra-skeletal differences may be due to taphonomic processes and differential kinetic diffusion parameters depending on the part of the skeleton and the individuals analysed (Maurer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Bone Preservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of trace elements has largely shifted from paleodietary reconstruction to their utility as diagenetic indicators, the two exceptions being strontium and barium (Burton and Price, 2001). Many studies related to understanding the impact of diagenesis have been recently summarized (King et al, 2011, Maurer et al, 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much evidence has been produced to suggest a degree of caution and heavy laboratory cleaning procedures to ensure that strontium and other chemical data produced from skeletal tissues are representative of activities during life and not simply diagenetic overprinting from the burial environment (Bell, 1990;Budd et al, 2000;Copeland et al, 2010;DeNiro and Hastorf, 1985;Hedges, 2002;Knudson et al, 2012;Koch et al, 1997;Kohn et al, 1999;Maurer et al, 2011;Nelson et al, 1986;Nielsen-Marsh and Hedges, 1999;Nielsen-Marsh and Hedges, 2000a;Nielsen-Marsh and Hedges, 2000b;Price et al, 1992;Smith et al, 2007;Snoeck et al, 2015).…”
Section: Bone Micro-samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%