2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracerebral stimulation of left and right ventral temporal cortex during object naming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent false negative stimulation the authors concluded that intensities up to at least 1.5 mA were required (Trébuchon and Chauvel, 2016). Other sEEG studies reported comparable parameters (Bédos Ulvin et al, 2017;Arya et al, 2019) applied ECS with intensities up to 8 mA (phase duration: 300 µs) or until the occurrence of behavioral effects, after discharge (AD) or seizure. Higher intensities, up to 10 mA were reported for ECS in anterior language area (ALA) but were also coupled with narrower phase width of 0.3 ms (Alonso et al, 2016).…”
Section: Technical Consideration Of Electrical Stimulation Mapping (Esm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent false negative stimulation the authors concluded that intensities up to at least 1.5 mA were required (Trébuchon and Chauvel, 2016). Other sEEG studies reported comparable parameters (Bédos Ulvin et al, 2017;Arya et al, 2019) applied ECS with intensities up to 8 mA (phase duration: 300 µs) or until the occurrence of behavioral effects, after discharge (AD) or seizure. Higher intensities, up to 10 mA were reported for ECS in anterior language area (ALA) but were also coupled with narrower phase width of 0.3 ms (Alonso et al, 2016).…”
Section: Technical Consideration Of Electrical Stimulation Mapping (Esm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early ECoG studies of Allison and colleagues reported a temporary inability to name photographs of famous faces following electrical stimulation in face‐selective (N200) VOTC sites. However, the ability to provide semantic information about the face and the dominance of effects in the left as compared with the right VOTC rather pointed to naming deficits . Puce et al .…”
Section: Summary and Challenges Ahead In Ieeg Mapping Of Face And Vismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, implementation of the MRI study with VBM and ROI analyses allows us to exclude significant changes. Moreover, a wide body of recent literature confirms a hemispheric specialization, with the left side involved in naming (Bédos Ulvin et al, 2017;Snowden et al, 2017) and the right side in face and voice recognition (Morita et al, 2018;Roswandowitz, Kappes, Obrig, & von Kriegstein, 2018;). All these data support our findings that the right ATL may be a key region for voice/face recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%