2020
DOI: 10.1111/ans.16007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intragastric balloon inside a Meckel's diverticulum: a rare cause of small bowel obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They mostly occurred in IGB left in situ for longer than the indicated timeframe, but can also occur prematurely. The small bowel was the most common site of impaction presumably because the IGB is likely to pass spontaneously once it reaches the large bowel; however, unusual sites of obstruction, such as the sigmoid colon and Meckel's diverticulum, have been reported [13,14]. Removal of the IGB was commonly via laparotomy or laparoscopy but can also be removed endoscopically or by spontaneous passage post percutaneous deflation of the balloon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They mostly occurred in IGB left in situ for longer than the indicated timeframe, but can also occur prematurely. The small bowel was the most common site of impaction presumably because the IGB is likely to pass spontaneously once it reaches the large bowel; however, unusual sites of obstruction, such as the sigmoid colon and Meckel's diverticulum, have been reported [13,14]. Removal of the IGB was commonly via laparotomy or laparoscopy but can also be removed endoscopically or by spontaneous passage post percutaneous deflation of the balloon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of the IGB was commonly via laparotomy or laparoscopy but can also be removed endoscopically or by spontaneous passage post percutaneous deflation of the balloon. Of the cases where laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy, risk of contamination, the patient's body habitus, and inability to access site of obstruction were reasons provided [14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%