2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3432764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramolecular charge ordering in the multi molecular orbital system (TTM-TTP)I3

Abstract: Starting from the structure of the (TTM-TTP)I(3) molecular-based material, we examine the characteristics of frontier molecular orbitals using ab initio (CASSCF/CASPT2) configurations interaction calculations. It is shown that the singly occupied and second-highest-occupied molecular orbitals are close to each other, i.e., this compound should be regarded as a two-orbital system. By dividing virtually the [TTM-TTP] molecule into three fragments, an effective model is constructed to rationalize the origin of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate the energies of the expected levels, we set the occupation numbers for both MOs as 1.5. 29 Under these conditions, for (TTM-TTP) + , we obtain that the SOMO is u and HOMO−1 is g, in agreement with extended Hückel calculations, 4 and the resulting energy difference obtained from the ROHF calculation is ∼ 0.4 eV. 29 For [Au(tmdt) 2 ], we obtain that the SOMO is g and HOMO−1 is u, in agreement with DFT-based ab initio calculations.…”
Section: Molecular Orbitalssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to estimate the energies of the expected levels, we set the occupation numbers for both MOs as 1.5. 29 Under these conditions, for (TTM-TTP) + , we obtain that the SOMO is u and HOMO−1 is g, in agreement with extended Hückel calculations, 4 and the resulting energy difference obtained from the ROHF calculation is ∼ 0.4 eV. 29 For [Au(tmdt) 2 ], we obtain that the SOMO is g and HOMO−1 is u, in agreement with DFT-based ab initio calculations.…”
Section: Molecular Orbitalssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…29 Under these conditions, for (TTM-TTP) + , we obtain that the SOMO is u and HOMO−1 is g, in agreement with extended Hückel calculations, 4 and the resulting energy difference obtained from the ROHF calculation is ∼ 0.4 eV. 29 For [Au(tmdt) 2 ], we obtain that the SOMO is g and HOMO−1 is u, in agreement with DFT-based ab initio calculations. 22 The notations for label of MOs are adopted to those in Ref.…”
Section: Molecular Orbitalssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations