2019
DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative Three-dimensional Virtual Reality and Computed Tomographic Guidance in Temporomandibular Joint Arthroplasty of Syndromic Craniofacial Dysostoses

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They compared two patients with traditional intraoperative CT based navigation to two patients treated using 3D VR guidance. They found no difference in complications or hospitalization times, but did report improved anatomic visualization and a statistically significant reduction in operative times (300 min for traditional CT navigation vs. 134 min with 3D VR guidance) [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared two patients with traditional intraoperative CT based navigation to two patients treated using 3D VR guidance. They found no difference in complications or hospitalization times, but did report improved anatomic visualization and a statistically significant reduction in operative times (300 min for traditional CT navigation vs. 134 min with 3D VR guidance) [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative planning with the Surgical Theater models was proven useful for optimizing the plan and led to improved safety and efficiency. 5,16 For aneurysms, a 29% reduction in time per clip used was observed after planning with SRP. 5 Intraoperatively, AR can provide improved visualization to guide microsurgical technique when the AR scene is injected into the oculars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative planning included the formation of a 3D virtual model, joint restoration planning on that model followed by AR-guidance intraoperatively. Preoperative planning reduced operation time from an average of 300 minutes in the traditional procedure to an average of 134 minutes ( P =0.03) in the AR-guided procedure 19 .…”
Section: Surgical Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the surgical plan (e.g. an incision site or osteotomy line) can be projected intraoperatively on the patient’s body for guidance, using AR (either displayed on a 2D smartphone screen through the camera or on a head mounted display (HMD) 19 , 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%