2022
DOI: 10.3233/tad-210362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic motivation for using a wearable hip exoskeleton

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Walking difficulties put an individual at high risk of falling, institutionalisation and even death. The use of robotical rehabilitation or assistive devices for walking has gained considerable interest as a means of improving patients’ gait abilities. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to examine patients’ intrinsic motivation to train with a wearable hip exoskeleton (Honda Walking Assist). METHODS: Rehabilitation patients (stroke, medullar lesion, orthopaedic surgery) and elderly (> 65 yr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When rehabilitating with Honda Walking Assist (HWA), patients with walking di culty showed augmented motivation as measured by Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) [27]. Implementing on 50 chronic stroke patients, powered hip exoskeleton could enhance gait clinical outcomes (endurance (P .033), balance (P 0.036), step count (P 0.013) etc.…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When rehabilitating with Honda Walking Assist (HWA), patients with walking di culty showed augmented motivation as measured by Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) [27]. Implementing on 50 chronic stroke patients, powered hip exoskeleton could enhance gait clinical outcomes (endurance (P .033), balance (P 0.036), step count (P 0.013) etc.…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 22.2% of the included studies had a poor quality [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], 55.5% had a fair quality [24,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] and 22.2% had a good quality [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] [Appendix B].…”
Section: Studies' Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included studies consisted of retrospective, prospective interventional, or observational research conducted in single or multi-center settings [Supplementary Materials (Tables S1-S3)]. A total of 17 studies investigated functional abilities [33,34,36,42,46,47,49,51,53,54,56,57,[59][60][61]63,65] [Table S1 in Supplementary Material], 23 investigated IC [32][33][34][35][36][37]42,45,47,49,50,52,53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]65] [Table S2 in Supplementary Material], and 26 investigated performance indicators [24,33,[35][36][37][38]…”
Section: Demographic and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations