2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsically disordered proteins and conformational noise: The hypothesis a decade later

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These interactions lead to the activation of latent pathways by rewiring the PIN to yield a new PIN configuration that produces the optimal output, underscoring the critical role of IDPs in regulating information flow ( Figure 2 ). Indeed, evidence accumulated to date lends further credence to this hypothesis as well as providing a conceptual framework to explain how IDP conformational dynamics and conformational noise impact cellular decision-making [ 2 , 17 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Conformational Noise and P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interactions lead to the activation of latent pathways by rewiring the PIN to yield a new PIN configuration that produces the optimal output, underscoring the critical role of IDPs in regulating information flow ( Figure 2 ). Indeed, evidence accumulated to date lends further credence to this hypothesis as well as providing a conceptual framework to explain how IDP conformational dynamics and conformational noise impact cellular decision-making [ 2 , 17 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Conformational Noise and P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein–protein interactions (PPIs) mediated by intrinsic disorder play a critical role in cell signaling (Bondos et al, 2022; Dunker et al, 2005; Iakoucheva et al, 2002; Uversky et al, 2005), allostery (Berlow et al, 2018; Eginton et al, 2015; Ferreon et al, 2013; Garcia‐Pino et al, 2010; Hilser & Thompson, 2011; Huang et al, 2020; Li & Hilser, 2018; Motlagh et al, 2012, 2015; Motlagh & Hilser, 2012; Tee et al, 2020; Tompa, 2014; Wrabl et al, 2011), and can act as molecular switches (Berlow et al, 2022; Choi et al, 2019; Dennis, 2015; Hong et al, 2020; Kulkarni et al, 2018, 2023; Kulkarni & Kulkarni, 2019; Lin et al, 2019; Salladini et al, 2020; Taylor et al, 2019, 2021; van Roey et al, 2012). The short lifetimes and reversible nature of the complexes formed by IDPs/IDRs with partnering proteins have been discussed at length earlier by one of us (Uversky, 2020b).…”
Section: Interactions Of Idps/idrs With Other Proteins and Surfaces I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than a decade ago, the conformational noise hypothesis was enunciated describing how noise emanating from conformational dynamics of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) which is distinct from transcriptional noise, can contribute to phenotypic switching and hence, phenotypic plasticity, by rewiring the cellular protein interaction network. 2 , 3 Since most transcription factors are IDPs, it was posited that conformational noise is an integral component of transcriptional noise implying that IDPs may amplify total noise in the system either stochastically or in response to environmental changes. This concept helped lay the foundation for the genetic/non-genetic duality elaborated by Salgia and Kulkarni 4 which is now well accepted in the field.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 However, such approaches have also revealed that phenotypic plasticity can result from non-genetic perturbations that include transcriptional and protein conformational noise, especially from IDPs that occupy key positions in cellular protein interaction networks, as well as from epigenetic modifications. 3 …”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%