Bourdieu’s Field Theory and the Social Sciences 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5385-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: On Doing Field Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The social milieu is conceptualized as a field, which can be defined as a sub-space 'in which individuals occupy positions in relation to one another in a struggle over the production, control and consumption of forms of capital specific to that sub-space' (Rey 2014, p. 154). Therefore, to analyze the field, we need to inspect the power relations between the different actors (Albright and Hartman 2018). Every field has legitimized capitals and the agents who possess them have a dominant status, in contrast to the individuals who lack capital and occupy subordinate positions (Albright and Hartman 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The social milieu is conceptualized as a field, which can be defined as a sub-space 'in which individuals occupy positions in relation to one another in a struggle over the production, control and consumption of forms of capital specific to that sub-space' (Rey 2014, p. 154). Therefore, to analyze the field, we need to inspect the power relations between the different actors (Albright and Hartman 2018). Every field has legitimized capitals and the agents who possess them have a dominant status, in contrast to the individuals who lack capital and occupy subordinate positions (Albright and Hartman 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to analyze the field, we need to inspect the power relations between the different actors (Albright and Hartman 2018). Every field has legitimized capitals and the agents who possess them have a dominant status, in contrast to the individuals who lack capital and occupy subordinate positions (Albright and Hartman 2018). However, there are different forms of capital, such as social, economic, and cultural, and they are interchangeable (Burke 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La estructura de cada campo social depende del estado de las relaciones de fuerza entre sus diversos agentes o instituciones, es decir, de la lucha por una posición hegemónica en el campo determinado y por la definición del capital simbólico específico para ese espacio. Cada campo impone así una visión y una división del mundo a aquellos que se involucran y aceptan tácitamente los presupuestos o reglas del juego de dicho espacio social (Albright & Hartman, 2018). En el caso del campo cultural, las relaciones entre sus diferentes agentes o productores culturales dependen de la posición que ocupan "en la jerarquía que se establece bajo la relación de la legitimidad cultural en el interior del campo de las relaciones de producción y difusión de los bienes simbólicos" (Bourdieu, 2013, p. 135).…”
Section: Campo Cultural Y Licencias Creative Commonsunclassified
“…While participants process capitals that can or cannot be operationalised within the field, capitals are not always operationalised with equal ease. There is, therefore, a need for skill in order to play the game successfully and secure one's own value (Albright & Hartman, 2018;Nash, 2018).…”
Section: Contextually Situating the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%