2006
DOI: 10.1007/11784012_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Non-rigid Image Registration Evaluation Project (NIREP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
134
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We have employed the NA0 Database [13] to demonstrate the capability of our method. In the dataset, there are 16 individual brain MR images, each of which has 32 manual anatomical labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have employed the NA0 Database [13] to demonstrate the capability of our method. In the dataset, there are 16 individual brain MR images, each of which has 32 manual anatomical labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can however be considered as a further evidence to support the value of our approach. A more advanced tool for benchmarking non-rigid registration algorithms might also be available in the future (Christensen et al, 2006). Fig.…”
Section: Experiments: Diffeomorphic Registration Can Be Fastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating its accuracy has therefore become an issue of growing importance [1,2,3]. Contrary to rigid registration methods, validation of non-rigid methods remains a challenging task due to the absence of a gold standard [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%