2021
DOI: 10.1177/1745691621991860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invalid Claims About the Validity of Implicit Association Tests by Prisoners of the Implicit Social-Cognition Paradigm

Abstract: In a prior publication, I used structural equation modeling of multimethod data to examine the construct validity of Implicit Association Tests. The results showed no evidence that IATs measure implicit constructs (e.g., implicit self-esteem, implicit racial bias). This critique of IATs elicited several responses by implicit social-cognition researchers, who tried to defend the validity and usefulness of IATs. I carefully examine these arguments and show that they lack validity. IAT proponents consistently ign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the brain measurements, the participants performed the implicit association test (IAT) which aims to measure automatic associations or beliefs that the participant is not aware of or willing to report [36,37]. However, given that the IAT is controversial [38][39][40], we reported IAT results only in the appendixes as tentative support of the main results of this study and our conclusions (see Appendices B and D).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…After the brain measurements, the participants performed the implicit association test (IAT) which aims to measure automatic associations or beliefs that the participant is not aware of or willing to report [36,37]. However, given that the IAT is controversial [38][39][40], we reported IAT results only in the appendixes as tentative support of the main results of this study and our conclusions (see Appendices B and D).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The issue, thus, is not that there is evidence against theories that postulate two kinds of attitudes, but rather that we do not yet know whether the measurands of direct and indirect measures differ; worse, that question has only been seriously addressed recently (Schimmack, 2021a(Schimmack, , 2021b. This is not the sign of a progressive research tradition, and it is entirely irrelevant for this concern that direct and indirect measures measure the same constructs for some theory or other.…”
Section: Anomalies Are Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, one of the many critiques of the AIDA-IAT method is that implicit measures lack predictive validity over explicit measures ( 41 , 42 ) and that the most promising use of an IAT is as a complementary method ( 31 ). In order to determine if the AIDA-IAT can be a valuable addition to the original AIDA, we analyzed if implicit identity diffusion is associated with borderline features above and beyond explicit measures of identity diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%