1989
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(89)90056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse heat transfer analysis of Bridgman crystal growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, imposed and actual velocity are not necessarily analogous, especially at high imposed velocities and when solidifying larger samples [437,441]. More importantly, the technique likely introduces a radial temperature gradient [442][443][444], thus in most cases, the thermal gradient is "bidirectional" vs. "unidirectional". Indeed, radial heterogeneity has been observed using the immersion technique [436,437,445], and the technique has been purposely employed to achieve radial microstructures [446,447].…”
Section: Achieving Constant Freezing Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, imposed and actual velocity are not necessarily analogous, especially at high imposed velocities and when solidifying larger samples [437,441]. More importantly, the technique likely introduces a radial temperature gradient [442][443][444], thus in most cases, the thermal gradient is "bidirectional" vs. "unidirectional". Indeed, radial heterogeneity has been observed using the immersion technique [436,437,445], and the technique has been purposely employed to achieve radial microstructures [446,447].…”
Section: Achieving Constant Freezing Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And leads to the melting at the interface and its shift down in the ampoule, as reported by Taghavi et al [18]. Similarly, this effect is behind the shape change of isotherms 500 1C, which are slightly convex for the isotherm 500 1C (1p, 3 mm/h), slightly concave for the isotherm 500 1C (2p, 3 mm/h), and concave into the melt for the isotherm 500 1C (3p, 3 mm/h).…”
Section: Comparison Of Stationary and Dynamic Temperature Field Measumentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In Fig. 2, the C f of the interface correspond to a significant edge (asymmetry [18]) in the 17 K/cm temperature gradient, which may cause inequality in the heat transport in vertical and radial directions resulting in the deformation of the isotherm 500 1C.…”
Section: Comparison Of Stationary and Dynamic Temperature Field Measumentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation