2018
DOI: 10.3813/aaa.919204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Scheme for Acoustic Source Localization using Microphone Measurements and Finite Element Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 6. Because of Im(C) ≡ Y , the admissible sets in (12) and (16) are equal and in particular independent of the data.…”
Section: Assumption 2 Let a Topology T And A Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 6. Because of Im(C) ≡ Y , the admissible sets in (12) and (16) are equal and in particular independent of the data.…”
Section: Assumption 2 Let a Topology T And A Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the simplifying assumption of unperturbed sound propagation in free space, it basically reduces to a signal processing problem (more precisely, deconvolution with respect to the free space Green's function for the Helmholtz equation) and can be solved by so-called beamforming methods and refined variants thereof, see, e.g., [30,4,36]. In realistic experimental scenarios, more complicated geometries, in particular bounded domains with combinations of reflecting and partially absorbing wall parts need to be taken into account by considering the wave or Helmholtz equation with appropriate boundary conditions as a model, cf., e.g., [16,35].…”
Section: Localization Of Sound Sources From Microphone Array Measuremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implemented optimization based identification algorithm is based on a gradient method with Armijo line search exploring the adjoint method to efficiently obtain the gradient of the objective function. Hence, the computational time does not depend on the number of microphones M nor on the assumed number of possible sources N. Further details, about the inverse scheme can be found in [34]. In the current implementation, the finite element (FE) method is applied for solving the Helmholtz equation (24).…”
Section: Fig 5 Ground Plan Of the Room With Source Location (Dimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, DAMAS will always refer to the integral equation (26) and not to the iterative Gau-Seidel method that was suggested in [9] in order to solve the discrete version of (26). The integral kernel ψ is usually referred to as point-spread function (PSF) and defined as ψ(y, y ) = P y , P y HS P y 2 HS = (C * (P y )) (y ) P y…”
Section: Damasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normal equation). The DAMAS problem(26) is equivalent to the operator equationC * C(q) = C * C obs (27)which is the normal equation of the CMF problem(23).Proof. First of all we can multiply(26) by P y which yields the equivalent integral equation C * (C obs ) (y) = Ω P y , P y HS q(y )dy .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%