2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41636-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Cross-Cultural Differences in Trust Levels of Automotive Automation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the Chinese version of the TPAS has good psychometric properties, providing an important research tool for research and practice of trust in automation in China. Given the previously reported significant cultural differences in trust in automation (Chien et al, 2016 ; Yerdon et al, 2017 ), our research will also be helpful for conducting cross-cultural comparative research to deepen the understanding of trust in automation. Second, interpersonal trust can be served as a valuable criterion to verify the effectiveness of trust in automation in the context of China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…First, the Chinese version of the TPAS has good psychometric properties, providing an important research tool for research and practice of trust in automation in China. Given the previously reported significant cultural differences in trust in automation (Chien et al, 2016 ; Yerdon et al, 2017 ), our research will also be helpful for conducting cross-cultural comparative research to deepen the understanding of trust in automation. Second, interpersonal trust can be served as a valuable criterion to verify the effectiveness of trust in automation in the context of China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies have indicated several significant personal effects on users' trust toward automated systems, including dispositional trust [2,33,45], personality traits [33,34,49,58], age [11,16,21,42,51], gender [39,59], and culture/ethnicity [19,28,29,53]. However, as far as we know, no empirical research has investigated how personal factors affect dynamic formation of human-agent trust.…”
Section: Personal Influences: Empirical Gaps In Human-agent Trustmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly in a study by Haboucha et al (2017), the authors found some nationalities are signifcantly more positive about AVs than others. Although attitudes to AVs may be associated with driving standards in the individual's country, due to the number of fatalities associated with driving, generally, much of the literature tends to fnd a relationship between attitudes to technology and socio-economic characteristics, with younger people, men, and the well-educated, tending to be more in favour (Yerdon et al, 2017).…”
Section: The Potential Impact Of Autonomous Goods Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%