2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating froth stability: A comparative study of ionic strength and frother dosage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metallurgical properties are sensitive to the stability of the bubbles in the froth phase. Stable froths may be used to achieve a higher recovery or yield (Botsaris and Glazman, 1989;Corin and Wiese, 2014). As a consequence the selectivity of the froth phase may be lowered.…”
Section: Considerations For Flotation Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metallurgical properties are sensitive to the stability of the bubbles in the froth phase. Stable froths may be used to achieve a higher recovery or yield (Botsaris and Glazman, 1989;Corin and Wiese, 2014). As a consequence the selectivity of the froth phase may be lowered.…”
Section: Considerations For Flotation Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is acknowledged that water should be considered as a reagent in flotation and, as such, the quality of process water becomes an important factor to consider as it may alter the pulp chemistry and thereby affect the flotation (Corin et al, 2011;Corin and Wiese, 2014). Previous work considered specific ions present in process water and their effects on the flotation of a Cu-Ni-PGM ore (Manono et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solids and water recovery is not directly affected by flotation reagents, but is affected by the changes in froth stability brought by reagent addition [27]. In practice, the recovery of solid and water to the concentrate is usually used to represent the effect of flotation agents on the properties of froth behavior [17,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%