Investigating the spatiotemporal differences and influencing factors of green water use efficiency of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China

Abstract

Combining freshwater consumption and wastewater emissions into a unified analysis framework and utilizing the epsilon-based measure (EBM) model with the characteristics of radial model and non-radial model, this paper evaluates green water use efficiency (GWUE) of 11 provincial-regions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) and investigates its spatiotemporal differences during the period 2005-2014, on basis of which the contribution rate of each input-specific green water use inefficiency in the overall green water use efficiency and the potential of freshwater-saving and wastewater emissions reduction are also calculated. The Theil index is used to explore the sources of the provincial gap of green water use inefficiency, and a random-effect panel Tobit model is applied to test the impact of the influencing factors of green water use inefficiency in the YREB. It is found that green water use inefficiency of the YREB is relatively low and regional differences is significant during the sample period, indicating a large potential of water-saving and water pollution reduction, and narrowing BGAP and WGAP of the Upstream is the key for improving green water use inefficiency in the YREB. The panel Tobit regression results show that economic development, technological innovation, water use structure, water resources endowment, environmental regulation and regional differences all play positive/negative effects on green water use inefficiency in the YREB, while these factors' influencing direction, degree and significance are significantly different. The conclusions of our study can provide considerably valuable information for the YREB to reserve water resources and reduce wastewater emissions.

Exploring the green development path of the Yangtze River Economic Belt using the entropy weight method and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

“…It also set the goal of carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutral by 2060, which demonstrates China’s determination to achieve high-quality coordinated development featuring green, low-carbon and circular development [ 13 ]. In view of this, scholars have paid extensive attention to green development and conducted a large number of relevant studies [ 14 – 35 ]. Here, we mainly summarize and review green development from the following two aspects.…”

“…Guo et al demonstrated that ER showed a significantly negative effect on regional green growth performance and technological innovation had a positive impact on regional green growth performance [ 25 ]. Overall, the majority of studies employed regression analysis method, such as spatial autoregressive models [ 24 ], panel vector autoregressive models [ 18 ], multiscale geographical weighted regression [ 17 ], spatial regression [ 21 ], spatial Durbin models [ 34 ] and random-effect panel Tobit models [ 35 ].…”

The impact and mechanism of vertical fiscal imbalance on green development efficiency: An empirical analysis based on city-level samples in China

“…It is also a fundamental requirement for regional development and construction. The level of population density not only affects the rate of energy consumption and labor costs in a region but also has implications for the transformation and upgrading of local industries, ultimately influencing green development [ 55 ]. This paper compares the total year-end resident population with the area of the jurisdiction, with logarithmic treatment.…”

Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry

“…The traditional DEA model is characterized with radial and oriented measurement, and it ignores the slack variables [27,35]. Avkiran and Rowlands (2008) [36] considered that although the non-radial and non-oriented SBM model can avoid the shortcomings, the traditional radial and oriented DEA model may overestimate the regional environmental efficiency.…”