2016
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201600833
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Structural, Spectroscopic, and Electrochemical Properties of [Fe{(EPiPr2)2N}2] (E = S, Se) and the Formation of Iron Selenides by Chemical Vapor Deposition

Abstract: The anionic L = [(EPiPr2)2N]– (E = S, Se) form of the dichalcogenidoimidodiphosphinato‐type ligands containing iPr peripheral groups has been shown previously to afford tetrahedral [MIIL2] complexes (E = S, M = Mn, Co, Ni, Zn; E = Se, M = Co, Ni, Zn). The syntheses of the analogous [FeL2] complexes [E = S (1), Se (2)] were performed in this work through metathesis reactions between FeCl2 and the corresponding KL salts. For both 1 and 2, X‐ray crystallography revealed two distinct molecules in the asymmetric un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(126 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average value of the four non‐equivalent Fe–Se bond lengths of complex 1 is 2.48 Å (Table ), which is within the corresponding values observed for tetrahedral Fe II Se 4 ‐containing complexes identified in the CSD: [N(CH 3 CH 2 ) 4 ] 2 [Fe(SePh) 4 ] (2.46 Å), [Fe(1,10‐phen) 3 ][Fe(SePh) 4 ] (2.46 Å), [PPh 4 ] 2 [Fe(Se 4 ) 2 ] (2.45/2.43 Å), [N(CH 3 ) 4 ] 2 [Fe{SeC(CH 3 ) 3 } 4 ] (2.47 Å), [bis(1,3‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐1 H ‐imidazol‐3‐ium)] 2 [Fe(SePh) 4 ] (2.45 Å), [Fe{(SeP i Pr 2 ) 2 N} 2 ] (2.47 Å) and [Fe(dmise) 4 ][BF 4 ] 2 , dmise = N , N′ ‐dimethylimidazoleselone (2.46 Å) . The recently reported structure of 1 SP surprisingly contains a square planar FeSe 4 coordination sphere .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The average value of the four non‐equivalent Fe–Se bond lengths of complex 1 is 2.48 Å (Table ), which is within the corresponding values observed for tetrahedral Fe II Se 4 ‐containing complexes identified in the CSD: [N(CH 3 CH 2 ) 4 ] 2 [Fe(SePh) 4 ] (2.46 Å), [Fe(1,10‐phen) 3 ][Fe(SePh) 4 ] (2.46 Å), [PPh 4 ] 2 [Fe(Se 4 ) 2 ] (2.45/2.43 Å), [N(CH 3 ) 4 ] 2 [Fe{SeC(CH 3 ) 3 } 4 ] (2.47 Å), [bis(1,3‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐1 H ‐imidazol‐3‐ium)] 2 [Fe(SePh) 4 ] (2.45 Å), [Fe{(SeP i Pr 2 ) 2 N} 2 ] (2.47 Å) and [Fe(dmise) 4 ][BF 4 ] 2 , dmise = N , N′ ‐dimethylimidazoleselone (2.46 Å) . The recently reported structure of 1 SP surprisingly contains a square planar FeSe 4 coordination sphere .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The FeSe 4 core of complex 1 exhibits a distorted tetrahedral geometry, as reflected by the magnitude of the Se–Fe–Se angles which lie between 101.7(1)° and 115.7(1)° (Table S2). The two endocyclic Se–Fe–Se bite angles amount to 115.7(1)° and are similar to those of the [Fe{(SeP i Pr 2 ) 2 N} 2 ] and [M{(SePPh 2 ) 2 N} 2 ], M = Mn, Co, Zn, complexes listed in Table . The dihedral angle between the planes defined by the endocyclic Se–Fe–Se angles of complex 1 is 86.8°, comparable to those of the [M{(SePPh 2 ) 2 N} 2 ], M = Mn, Co, Zn, complexes (Table ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The affiliation assignments for two of the authors (G. R. and P. P.) in the original article are incorrect; the correct links are given in this Correction .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%