Investigations on Deep Learning Techniques for Analysing Mammograms

Abstract

Mammograms have been acknowledged as one of the most reliable screening tools as well as a key diagnostic mechanism for early breast cancer detection. Though mammography is a valuable screening tool for detecting malignant growth in breasts, its competence as a diagnostic tool is heavily reliant on the radiologists’ understanding. Automated systems are now widely used for detection of breast cancer. Image processing techniques were widely used in automated systems for classifying mammograms. Of late with the advent of deep learning (DL) where images can be processed directly for classification, the DL is widely researched for medical image classification. Basically, DL techniques are representation-learning methods which aid in understanding data like sounds, images as well as texts. DL algorithms have the ability to learn multiple levels of representation as well as abstraction. Residual network (ResNet) is given due consideration as a kind of highly advanced Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). This work has offered a potential application of Visual Geometry Group (VGG), Residual network (ResNet) and Inception based CNN model for differentiating the mammograms into the abnormal class and the normal class. Experimental results demonstrated that the deep learners are effective for classifying mammograms and Inception deep learner achieved the best accuracy of 91.49%.

A Systematic Literature Review on Mammography: Deep Learning in Redefining Breast Cancer Diagnosis for the Asian Perspective

“…This technique improves the information about breast mass. (Ull et al, 2023;Bandaru et al, 2022a;Duong et al, 2023;Kahnouei et al, 2022;P and V, 2022;Li et al, 2019aLi et al, , 2021cMahmood et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022;Yao et al, 2022), (Tsochatzidis et al, 2021;Ahmed et al, 2020;Fathy and Ghoneim, 2019;Frazer et al, 2021;Sannasi Chakravarthy and Rajaguru, 2021;Chakravarthy and Rajaguru, 2022;Al-Antari et al, 2020;Al-Mansour et al, 2022;Alruwaili and Gouda, 2022;Altameem et al, 2022;Altaf, 2021;Cao et al, 2020;Al-Tam et al, 2022;Bandaru et al, 2022b;López-Cabrera et al, 2020;Saber et al, 2021;Chougrad et al, 2018;Falconi et al, 2020;Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi et al, 2021;Hanis et al, 2023;Lin et al, 2022;Mokni and Haoues, 2022;Mudeng et al, 2022;Khan and Masala, 2023;Oza et al, 2023;Prodan et al, 2023;Ragab et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2023b;Gerbasi et al, 2023;Shanker and Vadivel, 2022;Zhang and Wang, 2019;Adedigba et al, 2022;…”