1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.74.4627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization of Atomic Hydrogen by 30–1000 keV Antiprotons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
58
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
15
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, (7) 1.54 (8) These excitation cross sections are probably largely converged with respect to increasing the maximum principal quantum number n max of the Sturmian basis functions: Cross sections with n max = 30 (previously published for proton impact [1] and given in Table III for antiproton impact at 0.5, 1 MeV, and lower energies) rather than 35 (reported in Antiproton Energy (keV) crosses, two-center Gaussian-pseudostate (Toshima [7]); plus signs, one-center pseudostate (McGovern et al [3]); squares, one-center Sturmian (Igarashi et al [6]). Circles, experimental results of Knudsen et al [21]. Table IV) are the same, save for some differences of one unit in the third digit for 4s,3d,4d.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Again, (7) 1.54 (8) These excitation cross sections are probably largely converged with respect to increasing the maximum principal quantum number n max of the Sturmian basis functions: Cross sections with n max = 30 (previously published for proton impact [1] and given in Table III for antiproton impact at 0.5, 1 MeV, and lower energies) rather than 35 (reported in Antiproton Energy (keV) crosses, two-center Gaussian-pseudostate (Toshima [7]); plus signs, one-center pseudostate (McGovern et al [3]); squares, one-center Sturmian (Igarashi et al [6]). Circles, experimental results of Knudsen et al [21]. Table IV) are the same, save for some differences of one unit in the third digit for 4s,3d,4d.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Here we do not have experimental data for collisions with projectile energies below 30 keV (1.1 a.u. in velocity) [10], but there exist a number of theoretical calculations which should be reliable in this case of a very simple target. We choose to plot the so-called ''one-center atomic orbital close coupling calculation'' results of Igarashi et.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Single ionization cross sections for the Li atom by antiproton-impact are shown in FIGURE 1(c), with good agreement between the represent TDCC-1e and previous time-dependent basis-set calculations for the entire range of incident energy. [11]; solid (green) circles with error bars: experiment [12], (b) Antiproton-impact single ionization of He. Striped (red) squares: TDCC-1e calculations; solid (red) squares: TDCC-2e calculations [13]; dashed (blue) curve: Time-Dependent Finite Element calculations [14]; solid (green) circles with error bars: experiment [15]; striped (green) circles with error bars: experiment [16], (c) Antiproton-impact single ionization of Li.…”
Section: Ionization Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%