2018
DOI: 10.31274/ans_air-180814-529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iowa Beef Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finishing diet was formulated using the NASEM (2016) model with a target metabolizable energy allowable gain of 1.58 kg/d. Cattle were offered ad libitum access to the finishing diet with dry matter intake (DMI) adjusted using the 4-point feed bunk scoring system described by Lundy et al (2015) . Average steer BW was 604 ± 53 at the conclusion of the finishing period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finishing diet was formulated using the NASEM (2016) model with a target metabolizable energy allowable gain of 1.58 kg/d. Cattle were offered ad libitum access to the finishing diet with dry matter intake (DMI) adjusted using the 4-point feed bunk scoring system described by Lundy et al (2015) . Average steer BW was 604 ± 53 at the conclusion of the finishing period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%