2022
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1122/1/012015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iQRe: An Integrated Cross Scale Urban Resilience Assessment framework

Abstract: Developing successful urban resilience plans is a very challenging task due to the complex cross scale, multi sectoral dynamics of urban areas. This paper presents a novel integrated, multi sectoral, cross scale urban resilience assessment framework (iQRe) that facilitates bridging the spatial and sectoral gaps in the existing climate change adaption frameworks. The iQRe framework merges the IPCC AR5 risk assessment approach with the generic multi-criteria analysis methodology “SB Method” developed by iiSBE, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for the adaptation measures to be truly successful they need to be equally holistic incorporating many sectoral, spatial, and temporal scales. This holistic perspective allows the built environment to function as a unified and interconnected system (Khoja et al, 2022). Interestingly, this cross-scale and cross-sectoral consideration is also a critical and distinctive enabling factor of "smart" buildings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, for the adaptation measures to be truly successful they need to be equally holistic incorporating many sectoral, spatial, and temporal scales. This holistic perspective allows the built environment to function as a unified and interconnected system (Khoja et al, 2022). Interestingly, this cross-scale and cross-sectoral consideration is also a critical and distinctive enabling factor of "smart" buildings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of accurately assessing building resilience is aggravated by the lack of a standardized evaluation framework. This absence renders the interpretation of resilience scores ambiguous, particularly when contrasted with the well-established methods used for measuring progress toward climate mitigation goals (Khoja et al, 2022). This argues the importance of developing a standardised framework for assessing the building vulnerability and resilience to climate risk.…”
Section: Conclusion and Closing Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%