2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.506132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iridium optical constants for the Chandra X-ray Observatory from reflectance measurements of 0.05-12 keV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we fixed the density parameter. All in all, our results are in good agreement with the reported ∼ 1.0 nm thick with density of 1.0 g/cm 3 overlayer on iridium mirrors 15 .…”
Section: Overlayer Investigationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, we fixed the density parameter. All in all, our results are in good agreement with the reported ∼ 1.0 nm thick with density of 1.0 g/cm 3 overlayer on iridium mirrors 15 .…”
Section: Overlayer Investigationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the previous work, ground calibration was performed, and the x-ray properties of x-ray mirrors were clarified. Specifically, iridium optical constants for the Chandra x-ray observatory were measured in the energy band from 50 to 12000 eV 8 to tabulate the iridium optical constants over the full range for this observatory. Kikuchi et al 9 measured the atomic scattering factors around the gold L-edges for the ASTRO-H (Hitomi) 10 telescope with a sub-eV energy pitch matching the spectral resolution (∼5 eV) of the microcalorimeter soft x-ray spectrometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 It is well beyond the scope of this article to describe these calibration activities and results; the reader is instead referred elsewhere for detailed descriptions relevant to ACIS-S. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The adopted "1σ" uncertainties in the different energy ranges for the different subassemblies used in our truncated normal distribution Monte Carlo perturbation vectors, together with edge constraints (described above in Sect. 3.2) are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Assessment Of Subassembly Response Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%