2018
DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1459185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreversible electroporation for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias

Abstract: Cardiac ablation is an established treatment modality for the management of patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Current approaches to cardiac ablation employ thermal based energy to achieve lesions (damage) within the heart. There are many shortcomings and limitations of thermal based approaches. Electroporation (DC energy) is a non-thermal alternative approach to ablation that has shown significant promise in animal studies. Areas covered: An extensive review of the literature on the application of electropora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It exploits the localized application of short -nano/microseconds -high-voltage electric fields to induce irreversible electroporation, a prolonged state or pore-induced permeability that triggers non-necrotic deaths (Davalos et al, 2005), in the proximal tissue (Wittkampf et al, 2018;Wojtaszczyk et al, 2018;Sugrue et al, 2019) with high selectivity (Miklavčič, 2018) and without strict need of contact (Ramirez et al, 2020). These characteristics make the method an excellent candidate to avoid thermal collateral damages observed with radiofrequency and cryo-balloon ablation, among which phrenic/vagal nerve injury/palsy, atrio-esophageal fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis and thrombus formation (Sugrue et al, 2018;Wojtaszczyk et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It exploits the localized application of short -nano/microseconds -high-voltage electric fields to induce irreversible electroporation, a prolonged state or pore-induced permeability that triggers non-necrotic deaths (Davalos et al, 2005), in the proximal tissue (Wittkampf et al, 2018;Wojtaszczyk et al, 2018;Sugrue et al, 2019) with high selectivity (Miklavčič, 2018) and without strict need of contact (Ramirez et al, 2020). These characteristics make the method an excellent candidate to avoid thermal collateral damages observed with radiofrequency and cryo-balloon ablation, among which phrenic/vagal nerve injury/palsy, atrio-esophageal fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis and thrombus formation (Sugrue et al, 2018;Wojtaszczyk et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another theory is that endocardial tissue in closest contact with the electrodes is exposed to the very highest field strengths, while the tissues beyond the epicardium are exposed to a rapid drop‐off in electric field strength. The drop‐off in field strength further reduces the chances of collateral tissue damage 24,27,43,44 . Further modeling and preclinical studies performed systematically with the same PFA system are warranted to better understand field strength drop‐off, IRE thresholds and the impact on safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on cell membrane irreversible electroporation (IRE), pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been identified as a potential alternative to existing ablation technologies 16–23 . PFA delivery is not reliant on uniform electrode‐tissue contact for lesion creation, and can ablate myocardial cells without collateral tissue damage which may enhance the safety profile of this energy source 24–27 . Currently, no preclinical study has evaluated the potential for adverse effects from repeated overlapping energy deliveries on the same targeted local myocardium, nor provided a detailed analysis of the non‐thermal aspect of PFA based on electrode temperature recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] It represents an alluring method for cardiac ablation, as it is considered nonthermal and can be tissuespecific and performed quickly. Although there has been significant work completed in animal models [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] showing reasonable efficacy and safety with IRE ablation, this is the first inhuman data.…”
Section: The First In-human Application Of Pulsed Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%