2008
DOI: 10.1080/02841860802213328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreversible ototoxicity associated with the use of erlotinib in a patient with pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although other potential endpoints in such trials are of great interest, and may have a place as secondary endpoints in trials, we argue here, based on our initial experience with small numbers of patients as well as published studies on NF2 and VS, that a standardized assessment of these two endpoints should be included routinely in trials of antitumor drugs in NF2. We do not here systematically address certain other important aspects of phase II trial design, such as entry criteria (including definitions of NF2 and of VS in the absence of histological diagnosis), choice of trial design (e.g., singlearm, randomized with active or placebo comparator arm [30, 31], crossover [32], or randomized discontinuation [30, 33]), measuring responses in non-VS lesions such as meningiomas or other schwannomas, toxicities that should be monitored with special significance in NF2 such as ototoxicity [34] and corneal keratopathy (to which patients with trigeminal lesions may be especially susceptible) [35], or the “go/no go” choice of what level of response justifies proceeding to phase III trials for a specific agent [36]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other potential endpoints in such trials are of great interest, and may have a place as secondary endpoints in trials, we argue here, based on our initial experience with small numbers of patients as well as published studies on NF2 and VS, that a standardized assessment of these two endpoints should be included routinely in trials of antitumor drugs in NF2. We do not here systematically address certain other important aspects of phase II trial design, such as entry criteria (including definitions of NF2 and of VS in the absence of histological diagnosis), choice of trial design (e.g., singlearm, randomized with active or placebo comparator arm [30, 31], crossover [32], or randomized discontinuation [30, 33]), measuring responses in non-VS lesions such as meningiomas or other schwannomas, toxicities that should be monitored with special significance in NF2 such as ototoxicity [34] and corneal keratopathy (to which patients with trigeminal lesions may be especially susceptible) [35], or the “go/no go” choice of what level of response justifies proceeding to phase III trials for a specific agent [36]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a 400 mg/day dose of imatinib was administered for five days, bilateral hearing loss developed [6] . In addition to this, sensorineural hearing loss due to erlotinib was reported in a patient [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After treatment with first generation RTK inhibitors, 50% of patients have a secondary missense T790 mutation resulting in acquired resistance due to steric hindrance with a bulkier methionine (Pao et al, 2005, Shepherd et al, 2005, Engelman and Janne, 2008, Sequist et al, 2011, Majem and Pallares, 2013). Although no preclinical studies of their ototoxicity, one clinical case was reported with erlotinib ototoxicity (Koutras et al, 2008). The success of this first generation inhibitors coupled with the known acquired resistance has resulted in a need for new RTK inhibitor therapies with more sustained effects than gefitinib and erlotinib (Han et al, 2008, Butts et al, 2010, Mukherjea et al, 2011, Allen et al, 2012, Yang et al, 2013, Agustoni et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%