Is Barthel index a relevant measure for measuring prevalence of urinary incontinence in stroke patients?

Tibaek, Sigrid; Dehlendorff, Christian

doi:10.1002/nau.21203

Cited by 6 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…medical chart or unspecified). The popular Barthel index has been shown to have a low sensitivity to detect UI [35]. Secondly, publication bias is obvious in funnel plots for adjusted models.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death after new‐onset stroke: a meta‐analysis

John

Bardini

Mégevand

et al. 2016

Euro J of Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death after new‐onset stroke: a meta‐analysis

John

Bardini

Mégevand

et al. 2016

Euro J of Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most studies (62.5%, n = 5) were published in the last decade 2012–2022, and one each (12.5%) in 2007, 1997, and 1996. Three studies were conducted in Europe, 43‐45 three in Asia, 46–48 and one in the United States 49 . Only one study had the primary objective to validate assessment methods in a stroke population 50 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…47,48 Two studies excluded participants who were unable to communicate. 43,44 Pettersen's study 43 specifically included participants with cognitive impaired awareness of LUTS. Three studies 45,49,50 did not cite cognitive and communication impairment as a reason for exclusion, but one study used a survey data collection method that would self-select participants with less severe cognition and communication ability.…”

Section: Cognitive and Communication Impairmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…50 One study recruited from two sites, 50 and the remaining six were singlecenter observational studies: three were cross-sectional design 45,48,50 one was case-control 49 and four cohort studies. 43,44,46,47 Five were conducted in hospital settings, two in urology departments, and one in a survey in participants' homes (Tables 2 and 5). In total, 795 participants from eight studies were included for analysis.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluating methods of detecting and determining the type of urinary incontinence in adults after stroke: A systematic review

Gordon,

Davidson,

Roffe

et al. 2023

Neurourology and Urodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionUrinary incontinence (UI) affects over half of people with stroke. It is unclear which methods are accurate in assessing presence and type of UI to inform clinical management. Diagnosis of UI based on inaccurate methods may lead to unnecessary interventions. The aims of this systematic review were to identify, for adults with stroke, clinically accurate methods to determine the presence of UI and type of UI.MethodWe searched seven electronic databases and additional conference proceedings. To be included, studies had to be primary research comparing two or more methods, or use a reference test.ResultsWe identified 3846 studies with eight eligible for inclusion. We identified 11 assessment methods within the eight studies. Only five studies had sufficient comparator data for synthesis. Due to heterogeneity of data, results on the following methods were narratively synthesized: Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score (CLSS), clinical history and physical examination, Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index, International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICiQ‐SF) and urodynamic studies (UDS). Most studies were small and of low to medium quality. All reported differences in sensitivity, and none compared the same assessment methods.ConclusionCurrent evidence is insufficient to support recommendations on the most accurate UI assessment for adults with stroke. Further research is needed.

show abstract

“…To do so, it analyzes the following activities: control of the intestine, bladder, personal hygiene, transfer of hygiene, transfer of bathtub, food, clothing, transport of wheelchair to bed, walk and go up and down stairs. The total score can range from zero (dependent) to 100 (fully independent) (9)(10) . For Portuguese, the use of this scale was validated in the context of outpatient care, with a reliability of 0.88 (28) , although not associated to the study of diaper use.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Instruments for assessing adverse events associated with the use of geriatric diapers

Bitencourt

Santana

2019

Rev Rene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to analyze instruments for the evaluation of adverse events associated with the use of geriatric diapers. Methods: integrative review of the literature, in the LILACS, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases, with publications in Portuguese, English and Spanish. In the analysis of the data, categorization occurred by the identification of adverse events and screening instruments. Results: of the 19 publications, we identified as adverse events and respective instruments: motor deficit/Barthel index; Incontinence/Kings's Health Questionnaire and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form; skin moisture/ Transepidermal Water Loss; quality of life/Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; incontinence-associated dermatitis/Nix Perineal Rating Scale. Conclusion: instruments were analyzed that evaluated the adverse events associated with the use of diapers that may be potentially used in nursing practice.Objetivo: analisar instrumentos de avaliação dos eventos adversos associados ao uso de fraldas geriátricas. Métodos: revisão integrativa da literatura, nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE, CINAHL e EMBASE, com publicações em português, inglês e espanhol. Na análise dos dados, a categorização ocorreu pela identificação dos eventos adversos e instrumentos de rastreio. Resultados: das 19 publicações, identificaram-se como eventos adversos e respectivos instrumentos: déficit motor/índice de Barthel; incontinência/Kings's Health Questionnaire e International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form; umidade da pele/Transepidermal Water Loss; qualidade de vida/Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; dermatite associada à incontinência/Escala de Avaliação Perineal de Nix. Conclusão: foram analisados instrumentos que avaliaram os eventos adversos associados ao uso de fraldas que podem ser potencialmente utilizados na prática de enfermagem.

show abstract

Is Barthel index a relevant measure for measuring prevalence of urinary incontinence in stroke patients?

Cited by 6 publications

References 40 publications

Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death after new‐onset stroke: a meta‐analysis

Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death after new‐onset stroke: a meta‐analysis

Evaluating methods of detecting and determining the type of urinary incontinence in adults after stroke: A systematic review

Instruments for assessing adverse events associated with the use of geriatric diapers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About