2020
DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is chirp more effective than click and tone-burst during oVEMP test?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CHIRP stimuli were compared with a 500 Hz tone burst. Bas [16][17][18]24,25 On the other hand, Walther and Cebulla indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in N1 and P1 latencies. 22 In all studies, higher N1-P1 wave amplitude values were reported in oVEMP.…”
Section: Ocular Vemp Results With Chirp Stimuli In Healthy Individualsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CHIRP stimuli were compared with a 500 Hz tone burst. Bas [16][17][18]24,25 On the other hand, Walther and Cebulla indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in N1 and P1 latencies. 22 In all studies, higher N1-P1 wave amplitude values were reported in oVEMP.…”
Section: Ocular Vemp Results With Chirp Stimuli In Healthy Individualsmentioning
confidence: 97%