2011
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study

Abstract: BackgroundSingle reading with computer aided detection (CAD) is an alternative to double reading for detecting cancer in screening mammograms. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of a single reader with CAD is more cost-effective than double reading.MethodsBased on data from the CADET II study, the cost-effectiveness of single reading with CAD versus double reading was measured in terms of cost per cancer detected. Cost (Pound (£), year 2007/08) of single reading with CAD versus double read… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current data suggest that CAD does not perform as well as double reading in organised screening and is also considered to be a less cost‐effective alternative to double reading. Further improvement of CAD effectiveness is required …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current data suggest that CAD does not perform as well as double reading in organised screening and is also considered to be a less cost‐effective alternative to double reading. Further improvement of CAD effectiveness is required …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses were based in a number of countries including the USA (n = 18 239,257,263,267,271,272,274,275,277,278,283,[289][290][291][292][293]295,298 ), the UK (n = 15 241,243,246,247,249,253,261,265,273,276,279,287,297,299,303 ), the Netherlands (n = 4 242,244,256,259 ), Hong Kong (n = 4 [304][305][306][307] ), Australia (n = 3 254,262,302 ), Italy (n = 3 245,251,252 ), Japan (n = 2 284,…”
Section: Study Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such software for breast cancer screening in the UK was not found to be cost effective when compared with double-reading unless recall rate could be significantly reduced, for instance. 52 Our intention here is not to pronounce on the clinical and social value of AI-based CAD. Instead, we are of the view that a more comprehensive dialogue that involves a broad range of interested parties (including lay members of the public) is urgently needed.…”
Section: Inquire Into Clinical and Social Valuementioning
confidence: 99%