2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
237
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
14
237
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in respect of subjective visibility, we are following what is now a large body of literature that probes the strength of conscious experience using such measures (e.g., Lamy, et al, 2008;Overgaard, Rote, Mouridsen, & Ramsoy, 2006;Sergent & Dehaene, 2004) including carefully considered comparisons of different scales (Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, & Cleeremans, 2010). Of most significance, participants seem to use the scales consistently, with little evidence of confusion on their part.…”
Section: Subjective Visibility Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, in respect of subjective visibility, we are following what is now a large body of literature that probes the strength of conscious experience using such measures (e.g., Lamy, et al, 2008;Overgaard, Rote, Mouridsen, & Ramsoy, 2006;Sergent & Dehaene, 2004) including carefully considered comparisons of different scales (Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, & Cleeremans, 2010). Of most significance, participants seem to use the scales consistently, with little evidence of confusion on their part.…”
Section: Subjective Visibility Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, TAC can also be regarded as a synthesis of all-or-none [16,151] and graded [152] views of conscious representation. Indeed, through the stages of representations and processing in TAC both all-or-none ignition processes, and gradual evidence accumulation, amplification and consolidation processes, take place.…”
Section: (C) Relationships With Other Theories and Further Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple binary choices, where subjects only respond positively or negatively to whether they have perceived a visual stimulus, have proven not to capture the graded nature of visual perception. We therefore adopted a modified version of the perception awareness scale (12,13) in which subjects rate the clarity of their perceptual experience on an ordinal scale. Similar subjective measures of clarity have been used in patients (14), and it has proven to be a more indicative measure of perceptual clarity than strict dichotic measures (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore adopted a modified version of the perception awareness scale (12,13) in which subjects rate the clarity of their perceptual experience on an ordinal scale. Similar subjective measures of clarity have been used in patients (14), and it has proven to be a more indicative measure of perceptual clarity than strict dichotic measures (12,13). Therefore, to quantify the effect of TMS, one of four arrow-like figures was displayed as the second light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%