2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2703815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Digital Text-Watermarking the Long-Desired User Friendly Digital Rights Management? Copyright and Fundamental Values from a Comparative Perspective

Abstract: Many have argued that technologies used to protect copyrighted works usually go beyond the letter of the law and subsequently impinge on interests relating to freedom of information and expression, privacy and free choice. Classic examples are technologies that prevent CDs or DVDs from being accessed or copied under certain conditions, or that block or filter-out copyright-protected materials. This article assesses digital text-watermarking, which does not restrict users' access to or use of works, but individ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the insertion attack, we randomly remove the 10% of the words. 5 Replacement. In a replacement attack, a set of words in the watermarked text are replaced with other words [54,61].…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the insertion attack, we randomly remove the 10% of the words. 5 Replacement. In a replacement attack, a set of words in the watermarked text are replaced with other words [54,61].…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now, the techniques used to protect IP and prevent illegal use, like digital rights management (DRM) and technical protection measures (TPM), also prevent legal or permitted uses of the copyrighted digital contents [3,4], by representing a strong limit in terms of freedom of information and expression of the user. In [5], Lai and Graber point out the complexity to reach a fair balance among IP rights and freedom of expression and information. In particular, the authors compare the need of the IP owners and privacy and freedom of choice of the users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%