“…Researchers have proposed more-formalized approaches to weight-of-evidence approaches, such as quantitative frameworks using multi-criteria decision-analysis methodology, incorporating decision-analysis tools, using hypothesis-based assessments to better communicate uncertainties and inconsistencies, applying quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling, performing sequential analyses of lines of evidence to rule out risks, or using discriminant analyses to assign empirically based weights (Hull and Swanson, 2006;Matthews et al, 2007;Hujoel, 2009;Swaen and Van Amelsvoort, 2009;Rhomberg, Bailey, and Goodman, 2010;Linkov et al, 2011;Rhomberg et al, 2011;Pemberton, Bailey, and Rhomberg, 2013;Prueitt, Rhomberg, and Goodman, 2013;Rorije et al, 2013;Jiang et al, 2015;and Linkov et al, 2015). Others have advocated paradigm shifts, such as the use of Bayesian methods to integrate evidence from reviewed research and prior knowledge (Linkov et al, 2015).…”