2014
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is introducing rapid culture into the diagnostic algorithm of smear-negative tuberculosis cost-effective?

Abstract: Despite the increase in patients started on treatment thanks to culture, the relatively high cost of a culture-based algorithm will make it difficult for resource-limited countries to afford.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost evaluation was based on the analysis of the production costs [17]. "Micro-costing" method was adopted for costs of implementing each algorithm [19]. The evaluation of the costs was done by identifying, measuring and valuating the resources used in the production process [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The cost evaluation was based on the analysis of the production costs [17]. "Micro-costing" method was adopted for costs of implementing each algorithm [19]. The evaluation of the costs was done by identifying, measuring and valuating the resources used in the production process [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Micro-costing" method was adopted for costs of implementing each algorithm [19]. The evaluation of the costs was done by identifying, measuring and valuating the resources used in the production process [17][18][19][20]. The same costing approach that Yakhelef et al [19] was adopted.…”
Section: Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations