Is Methyl Methacrylate Fixator Reliable for the Treatment of Gartland Type IV Supracondylar Fractures?

Abstract

Background: In childhood supracondylar fractures of the humerus, fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wire is the standard treatment. In the case of irreducible–unstable fractures, these can be defined as fractures in which reduction is not well-achieved or in which fixation cannot be achieved with the K-wire. Intraoperative management of these types of fractures may be difficult. Treatment with a methyl methacrylate fixator consisting of K-wire and methyl methacrylate cement, as defined by the senior author of the article, may be a good option for Gartland type IV supracondylar humeral fractures where the fracture is unstable in flexion and extension due to complete periosteal tearing. Materials and Methods: The short-term and mid-term results of 27 patients between the ages of 4–12 with Gartland type IV supracondylar fracture of the humerus treated with methyl methacrylate fixation were reviewed. The patients were scored in terms of function and cosmetic satisfaction. Results: A total of 19 of the 27 patients treated with the methyl methacrylate fixator had full elbow motion function and rated the outcome of the treatment as excellent, which was judged by orthopedic surgeons on the basis of Flynn’s criteria. Six patients had nearly full elbow motion and evaluated their recovery outcome as good. Two patients reported nearly full range of motion (ROM) and evaluated the method as moderate in terms of treatment. Discussion: Treatment with the methyl methacrylate fixation method is an inexpensive method that allows early joint mobilization, provides strong biomechanical stability, ensures good outcomes, and should be considered in the treatment of irreducible and unstable supracondylar fractures of the humerus.