Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete

Deschamps, Jude; Simon, B.; Tagnit-Hamou, Arezki; Amor, Ben

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.021

Cited by 79 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Wang, Zhang, and Zuo 2016) x (J. Xu 2009) x (Zallio and Berry 2017) x T o t a l 7 4 3 3 2 2 1 Thomas, and Trentesaux 2013) x (Deschamps et al 2018) x (He, Xu, and Xu 2010) x (Karastoyanov and Karastanev 2018) x (Kuik, Kaihara, and Fujii 2016) x x x x (Panarotto, Wall, and Larsson 2017) x (Rönnlund et al 2016) x (Schäfers and Walther 2017) x (Schroeder et al 2016b) x (Schroeder et al 2016a) x (Siddiqi et al 2017) x (Simons 2017) x (Sun and Wang 2011) x (Trentesaux and Giret 2015) x x (Turner et al 2016) x (van van Schaik and Reuter 2016) x (van Schalkwyk et al 2018) x (X. V. x x (Zhao, Dang, and Zhang 2011) x Total 6 6 5 4 2 2 1…”

Section: Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The IoT is considered by experts as a good method for linking product lifecycle management and digital manufacturing, for example, through cloud computing x x (Dutta et al 2001) x (Fisher et al 2018) x (Giurco et al 2014) x x (Liao et al 2017) x (Lopes de Sousa Jabbour et al 2018a) x (Lopes de Sousa Jabbour et al 2018b) x (Moreno and Charnley 2016) x (Nasiri, Tura, and Ojanen 2017) x (Okorie et al 2018) x (Pagoropoulos, Pigosso, and McAloone 2017) x (Planing 2017) x (Rajala et al 2018) x (Reuter 2016) x (Salminen, Ruohomaa, and Kantola 2017) x (Seele and Lock 2017) x (Srai et al 2016) x (Stock and Seliger 2016) x (Thomas 2018) x (Tseng et al 2018) x (Unruh 2018) x (X. Wang, Ong, and Nee 2018) x Total 5 4 3 13 (Barbosa et al 2016) x (Bassi 2017) x (Deschamps et al 2018) x (Gürdür and Gradin 2017) x (Hehenberger et al 2016) x (Holligan, Hargaden, and Papakostas 2017) x (Isaksson, Hallstedt, and Öhrwall Rönnbäck 2018) x (Jensen and Remmen 2017) x (Kusiak 2018) x (J. Li et al 2015) x (Ma et al 2018) x (Mashhadi and Behdad 2018) x (Menon, Kärkkäinen, and Gupta 2016) x (Menon et al 2018) x (Minetola and Eyers 2018) x (Miranda et al 2017) x (Müller et al 2018) x (Pacis, Subido Jr., and Bugtai 2017)…”

Section: Lifecycle Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Wang, Zhang, and Zuo 2016), or new Internet platforms that manage product lifecycle knowledge and information (Menon, Kärkkäinen, and Gupta 2016;Menon et al 2018). Third, simulation can be generally adopted for assessing lifecycle performance, for example, environmental impacts (Deschamps et al 2018) and economic impacts . Among several forms of simulation, Digital Twin (DT) is the most common method for supporting data modelling and exchange (Schroeder et al 2016a(Schroeder et al , 2016b or holons development (Trentesaux and Giret 2015;Turner et al 2016).…”

Section: Lifecycle Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review

Rosa

Sassanelli

Urbinati

et al. 2019

International Journal of Production Research

487

280

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and Circular Economy (CE) are undoubtedly two of the most debated topics of the last decades. Progressively, they gained the interest of policymakers, practitioners and scholars all over the world. Even if they have been usually described as two independent research fields, there are some examples presenting overlaps between these topics, represented by hybrid categories like Circular I4.0 and Digital CE. Starting from these two perspectives, an innovative framework both highlighting the links between I4.0 and CE and unveiling future research fields has been developed. Basing on one of the two perspectives, results show as it is possible to enhance a set of different relations. Depending on a dedicated area of either CE or I4.0 it is possible to see the prevalence of some I4.0 technology than others. However, the influence of I4.0 technologies on CE is always verified.

show abstract

Section: Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Lifecycle Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Lifecycle Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review

Rosa

Sassanelli

Urbinati

et al. 2019

International Journal of Production Research

487

280

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Karasal ekotoksisite, termik santrallerde (elektrik üretimi) kullanılan kömürün çıkarılması (madencilik) ile ilişkili olabilir. Çünkü patlatma işleminden dolayı önemli bir alüminyum kirliliği ortaya çıkmaktadır, bu durumun karasal ekotoksisite göstergelerine katkıda bulunduğu düşünülmektedir [19]. Ürün 1 ise, "sucul asidifikasyon'da, en düşük etki kategorisi katkısına (% 66,95) sahipken, "radyasyon" parametresinde en yüksek etki kategorisine sahiptir (>% 90) (Şekil 2).…”

Section: Bulgular Ve Tartişmaunclassified

Türki̇ye’de Atik Malzemeden Yapilmiş Kendi̇li̇ği̇nden Yerleşen Harç Üreti̇mi̇ni̇n Yaşam Döngüsü Anali̇zi̇

Demirel¹,

Öz²,

Çiner³

et al. 2019

Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi (YDD), binaların ve inşaat malzemelerinin çevresel performansını analiz etmek için kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Betonda bağlayıcı malzeme olarak kullanılan çimento, üretimi esnasında sera gazı ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Dünya genelinde, toplam CO2 emisyonunun yaklaşık olarak %5-8'si çimento üretiminden kaynaklanmaktadır. Sera gazı emisyonlarının azaltılması amacıyla, çimentonun atık malzemelerle (uçucu kül, atık cam ve yüksek fırın cürufu vb.) ikame edilmesi giderek önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, beşikten-kapıya (cradle to gate) yaklaşımı ile atık malzeme (camPET ve uçucu kül) kullanımının kendiliğinden yerleşen harç üretiminin çevresel performansı üzerindeki etkileri ortaya konulmuştur.

show abstract

“…With the increasing risks of climate change and the depletion of natural resources due to their utilization in the construction industry, sustainability has gained wide importance and the term circular economy (CE) has emerged as one of the most important factors leading to sustainable development [ 1 ]. In contrast to the prevailing traditional economy system, which is based on a methodology of make, use, and finally, dispose of, the CE aims at continuous use of products by recycling and reusing instead of disposing to create a closed-loop system and reduce the resource consumption [ 2 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green Concrete for a Circular Economy: A Review on Sustainability, Durability, and Structural Properties

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A primary concern of conventional Portland cement concrete (PCC) is associated with the massive amount of global cement and natural coarse aggregates (NCA) consumption, which causes depletion of natural resources on the one hand and ecological problems on the other. As a result, the concept of green concrete (GC), by replacing cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), and metakaolin (MK), or replacing NCA with recycled coarse aggregates, can play an essential role in addressing the environmental threat of PCC. Currently, there is a growing body of literature that emphasizes the importance of implementing GC in concrete applications. Therefore, this paper has conducted a systematic literature review through the peer-reviewed literature database Scopus. A total of 114 papers were reviewed that cover the following areas: (1) sustainability benefits of GC, (2) mechanical behavior of GC in terms of compressive strength, (3) durability properties of GC under several environmental exposures, (4) structural performance of GC in large-scale reinforced beams under shear and flexure, and (5) analytical investigation that compares the GC shear capacities of previously tested beams with major design codes and proposed models. Based on this review, the reader will be able to select the optimum replacement level of cement with one of the SCMs to achieve a certain concrete strength range that would suit a certain concrete application. Also, the analysis of durability performance revealed that the addition of SCMs is not recommended in concrete exposed to a higher temperature than 400 °C. Moreover, combining GGBFS with FA in a concrete mix was noticed to be superior to PCC in terms of long-term resistance to sulfate attack. The single most striking observation to emerge from the data comparison of the experimentally tested beams with the available concrete shear design equations is that the beams having up to 70% of FA as a replacement to OPC or up to 100% of RCA as a replacement to NCA were conservatively predicted by the equations of Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE-1997), the American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-19), and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA-A23.3-14).

show abstract

Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete

Cited by 79 publications

References 27 publications

Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review

Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review

Türki̇ye’de Atik Malzemeden Yapilmiş Kendi̇li̇ği̇nden Yerleşen Harç Üreti̇mi̇ni̇n Yaşam Döngüsü Anali̇zi̇

Green Concrete for a Circular Economy: A Review on Sustainability, Durability, and Structural Properties

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About