Is Passive Surveillance Always Insensitive?

Harkess, John R.; Gildon, B; Archer, Pamela W.; Istre, Gregory R.

doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115041

Cited by 15 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The data clearinghouse system reduced underreporting, especially for sexually transmitted diseases and enteric pathogens, conditions that are often underreported ( 3 , 5 , 15 ). The underreported cases originated from all of the organizations participating in the electronic reporting system (data not shown).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multijurisdictional Approach to Biosurveillance, Kansas City

Hoffman

Wilkinson

Bush

et al. 2003

Emerg. Infect. Dis.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An electronic reporting system for a network of 22 laboratories was implemented in Kansas City, Missouri, with an independent organization acting as a data clearinghouse between the reporting laboratories and public health departments. The system ran in tandem with conventional reporting methods. Laboratory test orders and results were aggregated and mapped to a common nomenclature. Reports were delivered through a secure Internet connection to the Kansas City Health Department (KCHD); during the first 200 days of operation, 359 qualified results were delivered electronically to KCHD. Data were received more quickly than they were with conventional reporting methods: notification of chlamydia cases arrived 2 days earlier, invasive group A streptococcal disease cases arrived 2.3 days sooner, and salmonellosis cases arrived 2.7 days sooner. Data were more complete for all demographic fields, including address, age, sex, race, and date of birth. Two hundred fourteen cases reported electronically were not received by conventional means.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%